How do I solve this Thick Film, Double Slit problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a thick film, double slit problem involving phase changes of light in a medium with a refractive index. The key equation for phase change when light traverses a distance x is clarified as 2πnx/λ, where λ is the wavelength in vacuum. A participant initially struggles to connect thickness to phase change but later successfully determines the minimum thickness required for constructive interference, concluding it to be 488 nm. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding phase relationships in optical problems. The thread concludes with the participant expressing readiness to tackle additional problems.
jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



See figure attached for problem statement as well as my attempt.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where to go from here. Can someone help me get started?
 

Attachments

  • 2009Q14.JPG
    2009Q14.JPG
    28.7 KB · Views: 367
Physics news on Phys.org
When light traverses x distance in a medium of refractive index n its phase changes by Edit: 2pi*n*x/lambda (lambda is the wavelength in vacuum).

ehild
 
Last edited:
ehild said:
When light traverses x distance in a medium of refractive index n its phase changes by 2pi*n/lambda (lambda is the wavelength in vacuum).

ehild

So the thickness doesn't relate to its phase change at all? How am I suppose to solve the minimum possible thickness if I can't relate it in any way to the phase change?
 
jegues said:
So the thickness doesn't relate to its phase change at all?
Sorry for the typo. The phase change is 2pi*x*n/lambda.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Sorry for the typo. The phase change is 2pi*x*n/lambda.

ehild

Wow, I actually managed to solve this one...

\phi_{1} = \frac{2\pi nx}{\lamda}

\phi_{2} = \frac{2\pi x}{\lamda}

\Delta \phi = \frac{2 \pi x (n-1)}{\lamda} = \pi

Therefore, 488nm.

Now I just got to figure my other problems out :wink:!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top