How do I treat IR divergences in e+/e- to mu+/mu- scattering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eoghan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infrared Qed
eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi!

In e+/e- to mu+/mu- scattering, if the initial electron/positron radiates a photon, then I have an IR divergence. How do I treat it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually when you find an IR divergence it means that you didn't considered all the diagrams to a given order. For example, in the ee->μμ scattering you have the tree level diagram that is of order M_1=O(e^2) (where M is the related matrix element). If you want to add the diagram in which the initial electron emits a photon then you are adding a diagram of order M_2=O(e^3). Then, considering that you will have to take the square of the matrix elements your leading order will be |M_2|^2=O(e^6).
To resolve the IR divergence you have to add, for example, the diagrams in which the one of the initial (or final) particles emits and then re-absorb this photon (that is a renormalization diagram). This new diagram lead to a matrix element M_3=O(e^4) and so it could seem to be of higer order. But, since they all compete to the same phenomenon you will have to take the square of the sum of the diagrams and thus you obtain:

$$|M_1+M_2+M_3|^2=|M_1|^2+|M_2|^2+|M_3|^2+2Re(M_1^*M_2)+2Re(M_1^*M_3)+2Re(M_2^*M_3)=O(e^4)+O(e^6)+O(e^8)+O(e^5)+O(e^2)+O(e^7)$$

so, as you can see you have to include also the second mixed term in order to consider all the diagrams to the same order.

What you usually do is to give a small mass to the photon (in order to avoid divergences during calculations) and consider all these contribution. And the end of the calculation you can set the photon mass to zero.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top