How do I understand spin in quantum mechanics for Physics GRE question 2?

jdou86
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
Summary: please help me understand the following questions from Physics GRE test Thank you very much! To be honest i really hate this formalism. Memorizing such things is pain. but like everything it is what it is

Screen Shot 2019-08-18 at 3.45.05 AM.png
Screen Shot 2019-08-18 at 3.45.12 AM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-08-18 at 3.45.05 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-08-18 at 3.45.05 AM.png
    22.6 KB · Views: 274
Physics news on Phys.org
You will have to tell us more. Which parts don’t you understand? How far have you gotten trying to solve these problems yourself?
 
Nugatory said:
You will have to tell us more. Which parts don’t you understand? How far have you gotten trying to solve these problems yourself?
Only problem 2. I understand some part of it
I understand that for the ground state l should be 0 in total, and we can use j = l + s to do the selection. But would you mind sharing your steps so that i can learn from it?

Thank you very much!
 
Question 2 is about addition of angular momentum. State (1) is the singlet state which contributes zero spin for the nucleus, it isn’t a possibility since you can’t get spin 3/2 by combining a spin 0 state with a spin 1/2 state. The next three states are the triplet spin 1 states which can give spin 3/2 when combined with the electron, however the last state is ruled out by the magnetic quantum number.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top