How do I use F and the divergence theorem to find the flux and plot it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter renegade05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence Plot
renegade05
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Capture.JPG


Homework Equations



∇.F(r)

The Attempt at a Solution



I keep trying to plug F into the divergence theorem but end up with very ugly answers that I know are not right.

Is there a simple way to do this question? Also, how the heck would I plot this for for the specified function values! thanks! help with the flux would be appreciated to.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your starting equation should be the equation for the divergence of an arbitrary vector in spherical coordinates. What is that equation?

Chet
 
Can you show us your approach and what you did to get ugly answers for the divergence?

Did you use spherical coordinates? and the spherical variant of the divergence operator?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del_in_cylindrical_and_spherical_coordinates

For plotting you could use MATLAB or FreeMat (a free clone of MATLAB).

For the flux you have to integrate over the whole surface of the sphere. If you recall the surface of a sphere
is 4*pi*r^2 which might help you with the eventual solution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top