How Do Kinetic Energy and Momentum Relate When Energy Levels are Zero?

AI Thread Summary
If the kinetic energy of a particle is zero, its momentum is also zero, as momentum is dependent on motion, which requires velocity. However, if the total energy of a particle is zero, its momentum is not necessarily zero because total energy includes both kinetic and potential energy. While kinetic energy cannot be negative, potential energy can be negative, allowing for scenarios where total energy is zero while kinetic energy is zero and potential energy is present. Thus, a particle can possess momentum due to potential energy even if its kinetic energy is zero. Understanding these relationships is crucial in analyzing energy dynamics in physics.
steph01mcd
I need a little help.

A) If the kinetic energy of a particle is zero, what is its momentum?Explain.

B) If the total energy of a particle is zero, is its momentum nexcessarily zero? Explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The kinetic energy is (1/2)m v2. If the kinetic energy is 0, what does that tell you about v? (or about m!) What is the momentum in that case?


Total energy includes both kinetic and potential energy. Kinetic energy is never negative (since v2 is never negative) but since potential energy is always relative to some reference point, potential energy can be negative. For example if we take the potential energy to be 0 at the top of a cliff of height h, at the bottom the potential energy of a mass m is -mgh. Can you think of an example in which kinetic and potential energies cancel?
 


A) If the kinetic energy of a particle is zero, it means that the particle is not moving. In this case, its momentum would also be zero. This is because momentum is a measure of an object's motion, and if there is no motion, there is no momentum. This can also be understood by looking at the equation for momentum, which is mass multiplied by velocity. If the velocity is zero, the momentum must also be zero.

B) No, if the total energy of a particle is zero, it does not necessarily mean that its momentum is also zero. This is because there are different forms of energy, such as kinetic energy and potential energy. The total energy of a particle is the sum of all these different forms of energy. So even if the kinetic energy is zero, there could still be potential energy present, which would contribute to the total energy. Therefore, the momentum of the particle would not necessarily be zero. For example, a particle can have zero kinetic energy but still have potential energy due to its position in a gravitational field. In this case, the particle would still have momentum due to its potential energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top