How Do Lorentz Transformations Prove Light Pulse Symmetry?

physicyst
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Frame S' has an x component of velocity u relative to the frame S and at t=t'=0 the two frames coincide. A light pulse with a spherical wave front at the origin of S' at t'=0. Its distance x' from the origin after a time t' is given by x'^2=(c^2)(t'^2). Transform this to an equation in x and t, showing that the result is x^2=(c^2)(t^2).


Homework Equations



I think the relevant equations are:

x'=(gamma)(x-ut) and
t' = (gamma)(t-[ux/c^2])

The Attempt at a Solution



x'^2=(gamma)([x^2]-(2xut)+([ut]^2))
t'^2=(gamma)([t^2]-(2tux/c^2)+([ux/c^2]^2))

plugged into the equation x'^2=(c^2)(t'^2) and reduced somewhat...

(x^2)-(2xut)+((ut)^2) = ((c^2)(t^2))-2tux+((c^2)((ux/c^2)^2)

I think my algebra is crud somewhere, but the farthest I can seem to get this down to is...

(x^2)(1-(u^2)) = (t^2)((c^2)-(u^2))

Thank you for looking at my problem! I hope I put enough clear information down, this is my first time here, please let me know if I need to clear anything up, and thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicyst said:

Homework Statement



Frame S' has an x component of velocity u relative to the frame S and at t=t'=0 the two frames coincide. A light pulse with a spherical wave front at the origin of S' at t'=0. Its distance x' from the origin after a time t' is given by x'^2=(c^2)(t'^2). Transform this to an equation in x and t, showing that the result is x^2=(c^2)(t^2).


Homework Equations



I think the relevant equations are:

x'=(gamma)(x-ut) and
t' = (gamma)(t-[ux/c^2])

The Attempt at a Solution



x'^2=(gamma)([x^2]-(2xut)+([ut]^2))
t'^2=(gamma)([t^2]-(2tux/c^2)+([ux/c^2]^2))
You forgot to square the gamma factor but it does not affect the rest of your calculation because this factor cancels out anyway.
plugged into the equation x'^2=(c^2)(t'^2) and reduced somewhat...

(x^2)-(2xut)+((ut)^2) = ((c^2)(t^2))-2tux+((c^2)((ux/c^2)^2)

I think my algebra is crud somewhere, but the farthest I can seem to get this down to is...

(x^2)(1-(u^2)) = (t^2)((c^2)-(u^2))

Thank you for looking at my problem! I hope I put enough clear information down, this is my first time here, please let me know if I need to clear anything up, and thanks again!
You forgot a factor of 1/c^2 on the left side (it should read x^2 (1 - \frac{u^2}{c^2}). This is because you had c^2 \times (\frac{ux}{c^2})^2 = \frac{u^2 x^2}{c^2}. With this correction, everything works out.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top