How Do Photon Energies Vary in Relativistic Particle Decay?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relativistic expressions for energy and momentum of particles, particularly focusing on a particle decay scenario involving photons. The invariant quantity E^2 − p^2c^2 is highlighted, with its value being consistent for a single particle. A collision between two identical particles results in a new particle of mass M, which moves at speed v = 1/3c, and the energy of the resulting photons is derived from conservation principles. Confusion arises regarding the energy distribution of the photons produced in the decay, with clarification provided on using the zero momentum frame and the Doppler effect to determine their energies. The conversation suggests that direct calculations using conservation laws in the lab frame could also effectively solve the problem.
phalanx123
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I have this question.

Give relativistic expressions for the energy E and the magnitude of the momentum p of a particle of mass m moving at speed v. The expression E^2 − p^2c^2 is an invariant in the Special Theory of Relativity. Explain what this means and state the value of the invariant for a single particle.

A particle of mass m moving at speed 3/5c collides with an identical particle at rest, and forms a new particle of mass M which moves off at speed v. Show that v = 1/3c and find an expression for M.

The particle of mass M subsequently decays into two photons, one travelling
in the direction of incidence of the mass m, and the other traveling in the opposite direction. Determine the energy of each photon.

If instead the decay produces photons of equal energies, what are their
momenta and directions?


I have no problem in answering the first two parts of the question. the last part I know how to solve too: by saying photons are moving in opposite directions along the y-axis in the zero momentum frame. It is the third part where photons are moving parallel to x-axis which I don't get. The way it asks is implying that the two photons have different energies. Well fine if it is not a massless particle, in which case the speed of each particle in the stationary frame will have different speed and thus different kinetic/total enery. But with photons and such their speed is fixed, and they don't have mass, so in the zero momentum frame the two photons will have equal magnitude of momentum but in opposite directions and this will be the same in the stationary frame, since there is no change in velocity. So because E=p/c for photons, than they will have the same energy!? I am confused, could somebody sort me out please. thanks a million.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you know about the Doppler effect for light?
 
oh i see, why didn't i not realize that before! thanks a lot. So I say that in the zero momentum frame, each photon has same amount of energy i.e. half of the original energy, so use this energy the original emitted frequency can be calculated, than use the Doppler effect for light calculate the observed frequency for each photon, and thus the energy. Is my logic right? thanks ^_^
 
phalanx123 said:
oh i see, why didn't i not realize that before! thanks a lot. So I say that in the zero momentum frame, each photon has same amount of energy i.e. half of the original energy, so use this energy the original emitted frequency can be calculated, than use the Doppler effect for light calculate the observed frequency for each photon, and thus the energy. Is my logic right? thanks ^_^

That is one way to approach the problem. I don't think it would be difficult for two photons to do the calculation directly in the lab frame using conservation of energy and momentum, which would be another approach.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top