How Do Prescription Glasses Affect Vision Clarity at Various Distances?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IntellectIsStrength
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two optical problems involving prescription glasses and vision clarity. For Alex, who requires +2.0 Diopters for reading, the maximum distance he can see clearly without glasses is determined using the thin-lens equation, leading to a calculated distance of 50 cm after correcting an initial mistake with the focal length. Samson, needing -7.5 Diopters, faces a more complex situation involving a microscope, where he must adjust the distance between the objective and eyepiece lenses to see clearly. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding focal lengths and object distances in these calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights common challenges in applying optical principles to real-world scenarios.
IntellectIsStrength
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Two questions... first one is a lot simpler but I'm still not able to do it for some reason?

1. Alex is prescribed new glasses because he finds it difficult to read his favourite Physics book at a convenient distance of 25 cm. His optometrist recommends lenses of power +2.0 Diopters. What is the maximum distance at which Alex can distinctly see objects (without his glasses)?

2. Samson needs glasses of power -7.5 Diopters. Removing his glasses, he looks into a microscope where a slide of amibae has been inserted. The slide stands at a distance of 1.2 cm from the objective lens of focal lengh 1 cm. The focal length of the eyepiece is 15 cm. In order for Samson to clearly see the amibae, he needs to rotate the knob on the side of the microscope. This adjusts the distane between the two lenses by having the eyepiece move while the objective stays fixed. Determine the separation distance between the two lense which Samson starts to distincly see the amibae.

Can you please just offer some hints as to how to approach the problems?

For the 1st one, I used the thin lense equation but I didn't get the right answer.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My hint is look in your textbook for formulas relating focal length and object distance.
 
Also, in eyeglass problems, we normally use infinity for the image distance, because that allows the person to view the image with completely relaxed eyes (no eyestrain).
 
IntellectIsStrength said:
Two questions... first one is a lot simpler but I'm still not able to do it for some reason?

1. Alex is prescribed new glasses because he finds it difficult to read his favourite Physics book at a convenient distance of 25 cm. His optometrist recommends lenses of power +2.0 Diopters. What is the maximum distance at which Alex can distinctly see objects (without his glasses)?

2. Samson needs glasses of power -7.5 Diopters. Removing his glasses, he looks into a microscope where a slide of amibae has been inserted. The slide stands at a distance of 1.2 cm from the objective lens of focal lengh 1 cm. The focal length of the eyepiece is 15 cm. In order for Samson to clearly see the amibae, he needs to rotate the knob on the side of the microscope. This adjusts the distane between the two lenses by having the eyepiece move while the objective stays fixed. Determine the separation distance between the two lense which Samson starts to distincly see the amibae.

Can you please just offer some hints as to how to approach the problems?

For the 1st one, I used the thin lense equation but I didn't get the right answer.

Thanks

The hint to search your textbook is a good one because some assumptions need to be made. For the first problem, in reality a person who needs +2.0 diopter glasses for reading might be able to see fine at long distance. The problem Alex has is not the inability to see clearly at large distances. It is the inability to see nearby objects clearly. He is farsighted. I'm bit puzzled why the problem is asking for a maximum distance. It would make more sense to me if they were asking you to find the minimum distance.

I don't know if you have learned about "accomodation" (adjustable focal length) and if you are supposed to take it into consideration in these problems. You might want to take a look at this discussion and see if any of this looks familiar.

http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/refrn/U14L6c.html
 
Thanks for the replies guys.

I just found out that I made the most farcical mistake. For the first question (the Alex one), all I had to do was use the thin-lens equation and solve for di. But I used the wrong value for f... I used 1/2 instead of 1/0.5 ! Since the power is 2.0 D, all I had to do to get f was to get the reciprocal of the power (which is 0.5).
So I solved that... the answer is 50 cm.

Still though, for number 2, I'm not quite sure what to do. Here's my attempt:

Givens:
P= -7.5 D
do= 1.2 cm = 0.012 m
f1= 1 cm = 0.01 m
f2 = 15 cm = 0.15 m

Firstly, I used the thin-lens equation to solve for di of the objective lens.

1/f = 1/do + 1/di
1/0.01 m = 1/0.012 m + 1/di
16.7 m = 1/di
di = 0.06 m

Now, here's the part I'm not sure about. I used the di for the objective lens (0.06 m) as the do for the eyepiece in order to solve for the di of the eyepiece. Is this correct?

1/f = 1/do + 1/di
1/0.15 m = 1/0.06 + 1/di
-10 m = 1/di
di = -0.1 m

I'm not quite sure what to do next... not even certain if what I did was right. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.
 
IntellectIsStrength said:
Thanks for the replies guys.

I just found out that I made the most farcical mistake. For the first question (the Alex one), all I had to do was use the thin-lens equation and solve for di. But I used the wrong value for f... I used 1/2 instead of 1/0.5 ! Since the power is 2.0 D, all I had to do to get f was to get the reciprocal of the power (which is 0.5).
So I solved that... the answer is 50 cm.

I'm still curious what you do with that focal length for the correcive lens to answer the question stated by the problem. What does it have to do with how Alex sees without his glasses?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top