How Do Spin Components of a Neutral Particle Vary in a Uniform Magnetic Field?

Fips
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Considering a neutral particle with spin +½ and a dipolar momentum μ placed on an uniform magnetic field. Find the variation of the expected value of the 3 cartesian components of the angular momentum spin operator for the following situations:

a) the angular momentum of spin is alligned with the magnetic field
b) the angular momentum of spin is perpendicular with the magnetic field

Homework Equations


∫ < Ψ | Sx | Ψ* > dx = < Sx >, Sx = ½hσ, σ is the matrix associated, spin +½ = (1 0)

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought if i calculated the integral to get the expected value and then use the Heisenberg principle I could solve the problem. I figured i had to multiply the wave function with a spinor, since schrodinger's equation doesn't include spin. But I had no wave function so that's a no go.

2nd method was to only consider the angular difference given by the solid angle. Again with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, I'd get the variation of the expected value... thing is I have no clue on how I can proceed to calculate it in this way, is it just to say that θ = π and so it gets Φ=h/4? I don't think so :\

I could use apply dirac's method?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you are dealing with spin, using wave functions is not the best approach. You should try working with the Dirac notation or using a matrix-vector notation.

Also, the point in not find the angle of the spin (which is a classical notion), but the expectation values ##\langle S_x \rangle##, ##\langle S_y \rangle##, and ##\langle S_z \rangle##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top