How Do Three Connected Conducting Spheres Share Total Charge?

AI Thread Summary
Three conducting spheres connected by thin wires share charge based on their radii, with the electric field on sphere a measured as E_a. The total charge Q of the system can be expressed as the sum of individual charges Q_a, Q_b, and Q_c. A proposed solution involves calculating the charge distribution as a function of each sphere's radius, suggesting that charge is proportional to the surface area of each sphere. The surface area is determined by the formula for the area of a sphere, which is proportional to the square of its radius. Understanding the relationship between charge distribution and surface area is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
mitleid
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
Was curious how some of you guys would solve this problem...

Three conducting spheres of radii a, b and c are connected by negligibly thin conducting wires. Distances between the spheres are much larger than their sizes. The electric field on the surface of a is measured to be E_{a}. What is the total charge Q that this system of three spheres holds?

E = Q/r^{2}*Ke

Q = Q_{a}+Q_{b}+Q_{c}

The way I solved it is most likely not the way my professor intended. I said that since the amount of charge on each sphere is a function only of the radius of the sphere...

a + b + c = x

a/x = percentage of Q shared on sphere a (called this S_{a})

so Q_{a} = S_{a}*Q
and Q = Q_{a}/S_{a}

I imagine I'm missing a conceptual link that'd make another path to solving this more clear.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The charge surface density would equal, so the total Q is distributed according to the fraction of surface area.

Determine the surface area for each sphere and total of all three, then ratio the area of each sphere to the total.

Area of sphere is proprotional to r2, where r is the radius.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top