How do understeer and oversteer work? (the math and the physics)

  • Thread starter Thread starter hari00968
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Work
AI Thread Summary
Understeer and oversteer are explained through the relationship between steering angle, lateral acceleration, and tire slip angles. The formula presented indicates that an increase in speed requires a greater steering angle to maintain a turn in the case of understeer, where the front wheels slip more than the rear. The discussion highlights that when a car understeers, the front tires reach a higher slip angle than the rear, limiting cornering ability. Increasing the steering angle further exacerbates the slip angle difference, worsening understeer rather than correcting it. Understanding the physical forces at play, particularly how tire slip angles generate lateral force, is crucial for grasping these dynamics.
hari00968
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am reading 'Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics' by Gillespie. In the chapter 'Steady State Cornering', it explains how under-steer and over-steer works, using a formula, which is also derived. I can understand the derivation of the formula reasonably well. The formula is:

Steer Angle = 57.3 L/R + K*(lateral acceleration)

where:
L = wheelbase
R = radius of curvature of curve
K = understeer gradient (+ve if the car has understeer, -ve if oversteer, 0 if neutral)

There's a formula for K as well, depending on the front and rear curb weights of the car, in addition to tire properties, which is easy, no problems with that.

This is what the book says (page number 203):

"In the understeer case the lateral acceleration at the CG causes the front wheels to slip sideways to a greater extent than the rear wheels. Thus to develop the lateral force at the front wheels necessary to maintain the radius of turn, the front wheels must be steered to a greater angle."

"In the oversteer case, the lateral acceleration at the CG causes the slip angle on the rear wheels to increase more than at the front, thus diminishing the radius of the turn. The increase in lateral acceleration that follows causes the rear to drift out even further and the process continues unless the steer angle is reduced."

It's obvious from the formula that you would need to increase the steering angle with increase in speed, in the case of understeer, and vice versa. But I don't understand what's happening physically, with respect to the force due to the tire slip angles. I'm very confused with their explanations. Please help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
When making a corner with a 4 wheel car, the inner front and back wheels have less of a radius to follow than the outer front and back wheels.
Ideally, the inner wheel will turn just a little bit more than the outer, so that both follow the arc prescibed by the above mentioned radii.

For understeer:
If both front wheels turn the same amount, and the outer wheel follows its arc, the inner wheel will subsequently not be following its arc and will skid a bit forward or sideways if you like, while trying to turn. You will have to turn the steering wheel a bit more to follow the curve.

Also, the car has inertia with a CG and wants to move in a straight line.
The wheels want to roll along a path that they point.
The two are in conflict with each other when making turn.

Its not a very thorough explanation, but I hope it clarifies some aspects of your inquiry.
 
Hard to say exactly what you're after with this:
"But I don't understand what's happening physically, with respect to the force due to the tire slip angles."

The force generated by the tire varies with the slip angle. To generate more lateral force, more slip angle is required from the tire (front or rear). The amount of force generated by the slip angle is fairly linear until the tire is getting close to its peak, then the line curves over and starts back down as more of the tire's contact patch slides.

If the car is understeering at the limit, the front tires will be at a higher slip angle than the rear tires and are the limiting factor that determines the maximum cornering rate. Adding more steering results in more slip angle but if the tire is already at the peak, the force generated will be less than at a lower steering angle.

Here's an excerpt from one of the books I have:
http://insideracingtechnology.com/tirebkexerpt2.htm

That hopefully explains what you're asking about in more detail.
 
Last edited:
@mender,

"If the car is understeering at the limit, the front tires will be at a higher slip angle than the rear tires"

And like you said, up to a certain point, lateral force increases with slip angle. Assuming we're still within that range, if the slip angle in front is higher, the lateral force in front should also be higher, which should cancel the understeer right? I mean, if you further increase the steer angle (and hence the slip angle), you're only making the difference in slip angle between the front and rear higher right?

Besides, why is this difference a bad thing in the first place? Because it looks like it will cancel the understeer!

Sorry if my questions seem very trivial, but I'm really confused here!
 
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top