How do waves interfere in Bragg's Law?

AI Thread Summary
Waves reflecting off crystal lattice layers can interfere constructively if their path difference is an integral multiple of wavelengths. The confusion arises from the representation of these waves in diagrams, where they appear in distinct locations. However, the waves are not separate; they are part of the same wavefront that has traveled different distances. When these reflected waves combine outside the crystal, they create a single resultant wave with a modified amplitude based on their phase differences. Understanding that the waves are continuous and not confined to distinct locations clarifies the interference process in Bragg's Law.
mattg443
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I am aware that when an X ray is 'reflected' from the sheets of a crystal lattice, some radiation passes through whilst remaining radiation penetrates different layers or is scattered.

And that if the path difference of the wave traveled is an integral value of wavelengths, constructive interference occurs

However, my problem is, that in all the diagrams, I don't see how interference could occur, because the waves are in two distinct locations, therefore, not interfering at all.

E.g in the attachment, the wave that is reflected of the second layer cannot interfere with the wave reflected off the first layer.

Is this just an oversimplification of the diagram, or a flaw in my understanding?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • BraggDeriv.gif
    BraggDeriv.gif
    3.4 KB · Views: 501
Physics news on Phys.org
The wave is not a straight line, those lines in the picture are normals of the extended wave-fronts. Parallel lines mean the same wave.
Imagine light waves as waves on a lake or river when a ship passes, or see waves coming to the shore.

Part of the incoming wave is reflected from the surface plane of the crystal, other part reflects from the next plane. Those reflected waves unite to a single wave with common wave-fronts when leaving the crystal. The intensity of the resultant wave depends on the path difference between the component waves.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • bragg1.JPG
    bragg1.JPG
    17.9 KB · Views: 522
Ok, so the red and blue lines are wave fronts, but i still can't see how those two lines represent the same wave.

I see that it makes sense that they are the same wave, i just can't visualise how they could be the same wave, if drawn in two different spots.
 
(maybe another explanation/example will help)
 
For simplicity, imagine a wave traveling in the x direction:

E1(x,y,z)=A sin(wt-kx). The wavefronts are the planes where the phase wt-kx=constant. They are parallel with the y,z plane, and extend infinitely. Their normal is parallel with the x axis, and you can draw a normal anywhere. The wave is represented by the wavefronts, not with the normals.
Let be two such waves with the same frequency, polarization and direction of propagation, only the second wave has traveled a longer distance, so it has a phase shift with respect to the first wave:
E2(x,y,z)=B sin(wt-kx+φ). The longer distance can be because of reflection. The waves interfere, their E vectors is the sum of the individual E vectors. It is easy to show that the resultant is a wave with the same frequency, polarization and direction as the individual waves, but the amplitude depends on the phase shift, and the phase constant is different form those of both original waves. So you got a single wave from both original ones.

In your problem, there is one wave inside the crystal, but two reflected waves outside. They have the same frequency, polarization and direction of propagation. They interfere and make a single wave.

ehild
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top