How Do You Apply Jacobian Transformation to Evaluate a Double Integral?

tnutty
Messages
324
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Use the given transformation to evaluate the given integral.


\int\int(x-3y)DA
R.

where R is the triangular region with vertices (0,0), (2,1) and (1,2) ; x = 2u + v , y = u + 2v



Trial :

Using the points given I came up with these equations for the triangle lines :

y = 2x;
y = 1/2x;
y = 3 - x;

Now just substituting x = 2u and y = u+2v I get this :

u = 0
v = 0
v = 3(1-u)

plotting this , I see that 0<= u <= 1 and 0<= v <= 3(1-u)

And from the original integral the integrand is x - 3y. Again substituting
for x and y with the given transformation coordinate for u and v I get :

(x-3y)DA = -(u+5v) dv*du

Now the integral becomes :

\int^{1}_{0} du\int^{3-3u}_{0} -u - 5v dvdu

In which I get the answer -4/5 which is not correct. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok so the variable transformation sounds alright, but where is the Jacobian...? (as in the title)

as do you the variable change, you are effectivley rotating & squeezes the axes, dA = dx dy \neq dudv. So to preserve the original area you need to include the jacobian
 
Last edited:
Since :

x = 2u + v , y = u + 2v

The jacobian is :

|2 1|
|1 2|
= 2*2 - 1*1 = 3 ;

The the answer is -4/5* 3 = -12/5 ?

I still did something wrong I guess.
 
the limit for v is 0<y<1-u because v=1-u not 3(1-u) and you also need to include the jacobian in your equation, but you can just multiply the final answer you get by (3) instead of doing all your integrals after multiplying with the jacobian. And after doing this question I got -3 as the final answer.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top