How Do You Calculate and Test the Properties of Hydrated Alum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gunnar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chrome
AI Thread Summary
When calculating the theoretical yield of hydrated alum, it is essential to include the water molecules in the calculation as they are part of the compound. Cooling an alum solution in a refrigerator produces a more reliable yield because it slows down the reaction. To test for waters of hydration, heating the alum and observing any changes in mass can indicate the loss of water molecules. The melting point of alum is lower than expected due to impurities, which must be minimized to achieve the actual melting point. Overall, understanding these properties is crucial for accurate calculations and testing of hydrated alum.
gunnar
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi. I got some questions I need to answer. Just to make sure I'm correct I would appreciate if someone could comment on my answers.

1. Q. When calculating the theoretical yield of an alum that has water molecules attached to the double salt. Are these included in the calculation?
A. I should include the water molecules.

2.Q. Why does is produce a more reliable yield to let an alum solution cool in a refrigerator.
A. The reaction goes more slowly.

3.Q.How can I test the alum for waters of hydration?
A. By subtracting the water molecules

4. Q.Why is the melting point of an alum lower than the actual melting point?
A. Not pure enough.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answers are correct but I am not sure about #3.
 


1. Comment: Yes, you are correct. Water molecules should be included in the calculation as they are a part of the compound and contribute to the overall yield.

2. Comment: Good job, you are correct. Allowing the reaction to cool slowly in a refrigerator helps to slow down the reaction and produce a more reliable yield.

3. Comment: To test for waters of hydration, you can heat the alum and observe any changes in mass. The loss of mass would indicate the loss of water molecules.

4. Comment: Your answer is partially correct. The impurities in the alum can also contribute to a lower melting point. To achieve the actual melting point, the alum must be pure.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top