How Do You Calculate Average Power in an AC Circuit with Phasors?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate average power in an AC circuit using phasors, first express the voltage and current in RMS values, which are 70.7 for voltage and 7.07 for current based on their peak values. The angle difference between the voltage and current phasors is 30 degrees, derived from the given phase angles of 20 degrees and -10 degrees. The average power can be calculated using the formula Pave = (Vm * Im)/2 * cos(theta), where Vm and Im are the RMS values. It's important to remember that the cosine of the angle difference remains the same regardless of the order of subtraction. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately calculating average power in AC circuits.
ineedmunchies
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Ok I've been given a problem that I've got stuck on, I was wondering if anyone here could help.

Q:
v(t) = 100 sin(200t+20^)
i(t) = 10 sin(200t-10^)
Express voltage and current as phasors, and calculate the average power being supplied. (I've used ^ to denote degrees)

The phasors part is pretty simple I think, the voltage is a line 100 in magnitude and 20 degrees positive of the x axis, and the current is of 10 magnitude and 10 degrees negative of the x axis.

phasor.jpg


Its the power bit that I don't get, should I break these down into complex form and multiply them that way?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The phasors part is pretty simple I think, the voltage is a line 100 in magnitude and 20 degrees positive of the x axis, and the current is of 10 magnitude and 10 degrees negative of the x axis.

Be careful here. v(t) and i(t) are given in peak values. Phasors are represented in RMS or effective values.

To find ave. power, you need to find the power factor. Which is the cos(theta), where theta is the angle difference between the i(t) and v(t).

Pave = (Vm*Im)/2 * cos(theta)
Where Vm and I am are the peak values of v(t) and i(t), respectively.
 
Oh I forgot about them being in rms, that means they should be .707 times the peak values, because they are sinusoidal?

And theta would be 30 degrees?
 
Oh I forgot about them being in rms, that means they should be .707 times the peak values, because they are sinusoidal?
Correct.
And theta would be 30 degrees?
Correct also.
Dont forget that cosine of a positive and negative theta gives the same result. So it won't matter which angle you subtracted from what.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top