How Do You Calculate Collision Probability in a Particle-Filled Volume?

Zaphodx57x
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
In a volume V there exist N particles of diameter d.

If we place some detector in this volume, what is the probability that the detector will measure a collision in a time interval t. Or what is the probability that the detector will travel some specified distance into this volume.

There is a lot of room to make estimations and assumptions in this problem if needed. I'm trying to figure out the general method to attacking these "sorts" of problems, not solving the one I stated explicity.

This is the root question of several problems I've ran into in the beginning of a couple of astrophysics books. I just don't know how to generate a probability out of this information.

Its easy to find the mean free path from the number density of particles and the cross-section of the particle. But how do you generate a probability out of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the volume or cross-sectional area of the detector, and are the particles uniformly distributed?

One method is to assume a cross-sectional area of the detector and determine the number of particles passing through that area per unit time. One employs some "cross-section" of interaction.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top