How Do You Calculate Electric Fields and Forces Between Multiple Point Charges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter squissv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric fields and forces between the given point charges, first determine the distances of q2 and q3 from the origin, which are 0.120 m and 0.272 m, respectively. The electric field at the origin due to q2 and q3 can be found using Coulomb's Law, considering both the magnitude and direction of the fields produced by each charge. The x- and y-components of the electric field must be calculated by breaking down the vector contributions from each charge. Finally, the force on q1 can be derived from the electric field at the origin, again using Coulomb's Law to find its x- and y-components. A diagram is recommended to visualize the setup and clarify the direction of the electric fields.
squissv
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I could really use some help with the following question:

Three point charges are located as follows: q1= (0,0) m, q2= (0,-0.120) m, q3= (0.272,0) m. Take q1= 4.37 x 10-9 C, q2= -3.00 x 10-9 C, q3= 6.41 x 10-9 C.

a) Find the vector electric field that the q2 and q3 charges together create at the origin. What are the x- and y-components of the electric field?

b) Find the vector force on the q1 charge. What are the x- and y-components of the force?

I have tried using the summation of Coulomb's Law and a dozen other approaches, that I can't really describe because they were so haphazard. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It will really be helpful to draw a diagram of this situation first. They have actually been very nice to you in having you figure out distances and components by placing q2 and q3 right on the x- or y-axis. (Most problems are not so tidy...)

Which way will the fields from q2 and q3 point at the origin? What are the distances of those charges from the origin? Do the charges produce two field components each?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top