How Do You Calculate Electric Potential and Field for a Finite Line Charge?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric potential for a finite line charge with density λ extending from -a to +a, the potential V at a point r on the x-axis (where r > a) is derived using the equation V = (1/4πε₀)∫(dq/r). The differential charge dQ is expressed as λdx, leading to the integration of Qdx/2a over the limits of ±a, resulting in V = Q/(4πε₀r). There is uncertainty regarding the inclusion of λ in the final expression for V, and further clarification is sought on the integration process. Additionally, the electric field can be determined using Gauss's law and the relationship E = -dV/dr. The discussion highlights the need for accurate limits and integration techniques in solving for electric potential and field.
Brewer
Messages
203
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A line charge has density λ and extends along the x-axis from -a to +a. Find the electric potential at a point r on the x-axis (r>a). Use your result to find the E-field at r.

Homework Equations


V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _0}\int\frac{dq}{r}

The Attempt at a Solution


I've said so far:
dQ = λdx = Qdx/2a

Then I made the substitution into the above equation, and integrated wrt x with limits ±a, leaving me with \frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon _0 r}.

However I'm not sure I made the correct integration here. I also believe that the answer for V should have λ in it somewhere. Have I gone wrong somewhere?

I haven't actually gotten round to looking at the E-field yet - I'll get there once this is completed!

Any pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this correct? I've spent my morning researching this, and I can't seem to find anything to compare it to - I'm a little confused as to what to do when the point is somewhere on the same line. Are my limits correct?
 
You could find the Electric field using gauss's law and then use E=-dV/dr to solve for V.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top