How Do You Calculate Elevator Acceleration Using Scale Readings?

  • Thread starter Thread starter redshift
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elevator
AI Thread Summary
In an elevator with constant acceleration, a 50 kg person standing on a scale reads 55 kg, indicating the normal force is 1.1 times their weight. Using Newton's second law, the acceleration can be calculated as a = (Fn - mg)/m, leading to an acceleration of 0.98 m/s². An alternative method involves setting the scale reading equal to the normal force and solving for acceleration, yielding a = 1.1 m/s². Both methods provide valid results, highlighting different approaches to the same problem. The discussion emphasizes the simplicity and elegance of the calculations involved in determining elevator acceleration.
redshift
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
"In an elevator that is moving with constant acceleration, a person of 50 kg mass is standing on a bathroom scale that shows "55 kg". Determine the accerlation of the elevator."
I'm pretty sure my answer is right. I'm just wondering if there's another way.

So, 55 kg is 1.1 times 50 kg.
Therefore, the normal force (Fn) acting on the person is 1.1mg

By Newton's second law,
F = ma
Fn - mg = ma
a = (Fn -mg)/m
a = (1.1mg - mg)/m (plugging in the above substitution)
a = g(1.1-1)
a = 0.98 m/s^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are possibly many ways (I don't know any, though) to solve this problem correctly, but your way seems to me as the simplest, and hence, most elegant.
 


Your calculation is correct. Another way to approach this problem is by using the equation for weight, which is W=mg. Since the scale is showing 55 kg, it means that the person's weight is 55 kg. We can then set this equal to the normal force (Fn) and solve for acceleration:

W=Fn
55 kg = Fn

Since Fn = ma, we can substitute this into the equation:

55 kg = ma

We also know that the person's mass is 50 kg, so we can substitute this in as well:

55 kg = 50 kg * a

Solving for a, we get:

a = 55 kg / 50 kg = 1.1 m/s^2

Both methods will give you the same answer, but the second approach uses the specific equation for weight and may be more straightforward for some individuals.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top