How Do You Calculate Force from a Two-Dimensional Potential Energy Function?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force from a two-dimensional potential energy function, the force vector is derived from the negative gradient of the potential energy function U. Specifically, for the given potential U = 3x^3 * y - 7x, the force components can be found using partial derivatives: Fx = -∂U/∂x and Fy = -∂U/∂y. The resulting force vector is expressed as F(x,y) = ⟨Fx, Fy⟩. It is clarified that the force vector has both magnitude and direction, and the calculation involves taking partial derivatives rather than integration. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurately determining the force in a two-dimensional context.
Thermon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A potential energy function for a two-dimensional force is of the form U = 3x3 * y - 7x.
Find the force that acts at the point (x, y).[/B]

Homework Equations


In a 1-dimensional case:
ΔU = -∫Fx dx
dU = -Fx dx
Fx = -dU/dx

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to find the force in a 1-dimensional case; it's the gradient at the given x.

But I can't wrap my head around it when there are two variables.

Could it perhaps be the sum of the derivatives; Fx = -(dU/dx + dU/dy)?[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thermon said:

Homework Statement


A potential energy function for a two-dimensional force is of the form U = 3x3 * y - 7x.
Find the force that acts at the point (x, y).[/B]

Homework Equations


In a 1-dimensional case:
ΔU = -∫Fx dx
dU = -Fx dx
Fx = -dU/dx

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to find the force in a 1-dimensional case; it's the gradient at the given x.

But I can't wrap my head around it when there are two variables.

Could it perhaps be the sum of the derivatives; Fx = -(dU/dx + dU/dy)?[/B]
The force will be a vector. If ##\phi(x,y)## is a potential for ##\vec F(x,y)## then$$
\vec F(x,y) = \langle \phi_x,\phi_y\rangle$$
 
LCKurtz said:
The force will be a vector. If ##\phi(x,y)## is a potential for ##\vec F(x,y)## then$$
\vec F(x,y) = \langle \phi_x,\phi_y\rangle$$

So it's the combined vector of Vy and Vx? Correct me if I'm wrong, but does that means that the force at (x, y) would be the net vector of the Epot up and downwards against Ekin?
Finding those two would involve finding the integral of both Fx and Fy
 
LCKurtz said:
The force will be a vector. If ##\phi(x,y)## is a potential for ##\vec F(x,y)## then$$
\vec F(x,y) = \langle \phi_x,\phi_y\rangle$$

Thermon said:
So it's the combined vector of Vy and Vx? Correct me if I'm wrong, but does that means that the force at (x, y) would be the net vector of the Epot up and downwards against Ekin?
Finding those two would involve finding the integral of both Fx and Fy

I don't know what you mean by "combined vector" and "net vector" and "upwards and downwards". It is a force vector field having two components or a magnitude and direction. And I don't know what Fx and Fy you are talking about. You get the vector field from the potential by taking the partials of the potential, not integrating, as I gave in the formula above.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top