How Do You Calculate Pool Depth Using Refraction Principles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsstudent14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Refraction Swimming
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the depth of a swimming pool using refraction principles, Snell's law is applied with the indices of refraction for air and water. The problem involves determining the angle of refraction when sunlight hits the water at a 20-degree angle above the horizon, leading to a calculated angle of 45 degrees in water. The depth is then derived from the pool's width using the tangent of this angle, resulting in a depth of 4 meters. The discussion highlights the importance of unit consistency, noting a common mistake in converting measurements. Overall, the solution is confirmed as correct, emphasizing the need for careful attention to detail in calculations.
physicsstudent14
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 4.0-m-wide swimming pool is filled to the top. The bottom of the pool becomes completely shaded in the afternoon when the sun is 20 degrees above the horizon. How deep is the pool?

Homework Equations


Snell's law
(n1)sin(x1) = (n2)sin(x2)
Index of Refraction of Air = 1
Index of Refraction of Water = 1.33

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a picture with the sun 20 degrees above the horizontal, which meant that x1 is 70 degrees relative to the normal. I know n1 is the index of refraction of Air, 1. I solved for x2, using n2 = index of refraction of water = 1.33.

(n1)sin(x1) = (n2)sin(x2)
(1)sin(70) = (1.33)sin(x2)

I solved for x2 and got 45 degrees for the light angle in water relative to the normal.

Now that I know x2, I tried to solve for the depth of the pool d by using the width w = 4.0 m.

I got tan(x2) = (4 m)/d
d = (4 m)/tan(45) = 4 m.

I don't think my result makes sense. It seems too simple. How am I supposed to figure out the depth of the pool? I've never experienced a problem where the bottom was completely shaded. Can someone please explain to me what I'm doing incorrectly? Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have solved the problem correctly--whether you know it or not. (Correct your units--it's meters, not centimeters.)

Imagine the sun is coming from the right, hitting the water. The light refracts in accordance with Snell's law. Now consider the light that just hits the right-most section of the pool water. If that light bends enough so that it hits the wall of the pool, not the bottom, then surely none of the other light will shine on the pool bottom. (Draw yourself a picture and you'll understand it better.) Make sense?
 
edit: Doc Al beat me to it.
-------------
Everything is fine, all the way to (4m)/tan(45 degrees)
How'd you get 4 centimeters?? tan(45 degrees) = 1

Otherwise, everything is good.
 
Thanks I think I understand it now. I just messed up on the units.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top