How Do You Calculate Resultant Force Vectors and Their Angles?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the resultant force vectors and their angles, the forces F1 and F2 were expressed in Cartesian coordinates. The calculations for F1 yielded components of 260i + 0j - 150k, while F2 was initially miscalculated but corrected to 250i + 306j - 354k. The resultant force was computed as 510i + 306j - 504k, leading to an incorrect magnitude of approximately 779 N. The correct magnitude should be 733 N, with angles of 53.5°, 65.3°, and 133° for the respective axes. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately applying trigonometric functions in vector calculations.
rico22
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a) Express each force as a Cartesian vector.

b) Determine the magnitude and coordinate direction angles of the resultant force acting on the hook.

See figured attached.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


First I expressed F1 and F2 into its x, y, and z components.
F1: 300(cos 30°)\hat{}i +0\hat{}j -300(sin30°)\hat{}k... this gives 260\hat{}i +0\hat{}j -150\hat{}k

F2: 500(cos 45)(sin 45) + 500(cos 45)(cos 30) - 500(sin 45)
250\hat{}i + 306\hat{}j - 354\hat{}k

Resultant (FR) = F1 + F2: 510\hat{}i +306\hat{}j - 504\hat{}k

magnitude of resultant = √(5102+3062+(-504)2) ≈779 N

θx= cos-1(510/779) ≈49°

θy= cos-1(306/779) ≈67°

θz= cos-1(504/779) ≈130°

But this is wrong its supposed to be magnitude of resultant = 733N with angles of 53.5, 65.3, 133 respectively. I don't really know what I am doing wrong. Any type of help would greatly be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • phpRKwJ2v.png
    phpRKwJ2v.png
    6.6 KB · Views: 1,830
Physics news on Phys.org
Double check this: F2: 500(cos 45)(sin 45) + 500(cos 45)(cos 30) - 500(sin 45)
Particulary 500(cos 45)(sin 45)
 
Last edited:
oh wow, ... thanks!... even when I was typing it I didn't catch it...
 
F2x=500cos(45)sin(30)
that is the right one
 
Ahmed Said said:
F2x=500cos(45)sin(30)
that is the right one

You might be six years too late with that answer!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top