How Do You Calculate Spherical Harmonics for Given Quantum Numbers?

noblegas
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

Find the speherical harmonics (Y_1)^1, (Y_1)^0, (Y_1)^-1 as functions of the polar angles \theta and \psi and as functions of the cartesian coordinates x, y , and z.

Homework Equations



\(phi_l)^l= sin^l(\theta)*e^il\psi

L_\(phi_l)^l=(d/(d\theta))*\phi_l^l-l cot(\theta)\phi_l^l

The Attempt at a Solution



The first thing I should do is normalized\(phi_l)^l to get a value for the A constant

A^2*(sin^l(\theta)*exp(il\psi))^2=1; should I plug in the values for m and l before I normalized the function or after I normalized the function

once I get the value for \(phi_l)^l I can plug in this value into L_\(phi_l)^l=(d/(d\theta))*(\phi_l)^l-(l cot(\theta))(\phi_l)^l correct?Not sure why I am finding the value for the lower opperator. Please inform me if you have a reallly really hard time understanding the latex code.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
just let me know if my latex is unreadable
 
noblegas said:
just let me know if my latex is unreadable

Pretty much - I'm not sure what it is you need to do; Do you need to derive the spherical harmonics directly from their defining differential equation or do you merely need to express them in the different coordinate systems?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top