How Do You Calculate the Electric Field from an Arc?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field from an arc, the formula E = k*Q/r^2 is used, where k is a constant, Q is charge, and r is distance. The discussion involves integrating to find the electric field, with attempts leading to an expression involving cos(theta) and specific limits. The arc's symmetry about the x-axis allows for integration from -10π/21 to 10π/21, suggesting that the answer should be doubled. The expression theta/sin(theta) is proposed as a potential solution, with theta representing half the angle of the arc in radians. Overall, the integration approach and symmetry considerations are crucial for determining the electric field.
VitaX
Messages
183
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



34hxw6u.png


Homework Equations



E = k*Q/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to get the factor through integrating, but it was wrong.I ended up with (k*lambda*2)/R multiplied by the integral of cos(theta) dtheta. Limits were 10pi/21 and 0. I then divided by k*Q/r^2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
0 to 2π is a complete circle.

The arc appears to be symmetric WRT the x-axis, integrate cosθ from ‒10π/21 to 10π/21 , which should give twice the answer you had.
 
Is theta/sin(theta) the answer to this problem? theta being in radians and half the angle of the arc.
 
Last edited:
VitaX said:
Is theta/sin(theta) the answer to this problem? theta being in radians and half the angle of the arc.

I'm sorry, I only looked at your integral in my earlier post. The 2 in the factor preceding your integral makes up for only integrating over half the arc.

Depending upon what you are using for θ, your answer of θ/sinθ looks good.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top