How Do You Calculate the Electric Field Inside and Outside a Charged Metal Tube?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field inside and outside a charged metal tube, use the formula E = λ/(2πεr), where λ is the charge per unit length and ε is the permittivity of free space. For a radial distance of 3.15 cm (inside the tube), the electric field is 0 N/C, as the electric field inside a conductor is zero. For a radial distance of 10.5 cm (outside the tube), the electric field calculates to 12,569 N/C. The radius of the tube (5.56 cm) is only relevant for determining whether the point of interest is inside or outside the tube. Understanding Gauss' Law is crucial for solving such problems effectively.
ghetto_bird25
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
hey guys i was wondering if anyone could help me with this question, kinda got stuck

Homework Statement


Figure 24-31 shows a section of a long, thin-walled metal tube of radius R = 5.56 cm, with a charge per unit length λ = 7.34 x 10-8 C/m. What is the magnitude E of the electric field at radial distance (a)r = 3.15 cm and (b)r = 10.5 cm.
http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1141/art/qb/qu/c24/Fig23_34.gif

Homework Equations


E=\lambda/2\pi\epsilonr


The Attempt at a Solution


well i tried using that equation but got stuck with the radius and where to plug it in since you get 5.56 cm, but wasn't too sure how to exactly plug in the other radius. also i was wondering if that was how you do the question and if you had to plug in the radius in that equation and not R=5.56cm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are given the charge density per meter. Think about Gauss' Law. The only role that R = 5.56 cm plays in the problem is to determine whether r is inside or outside of the cylinder.
 
ic so would \epsilon_{O} be 8.85e-12 C^2/N m^2
 
If that's the usual value for the permittivity of free space, yes.
 
ok thanks that realli helped, btw the answer for this is a) 0 N/C b)12569 N/C
thanks again
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top