How Do You Calculate the Final Speeds of Pool Balls After Collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kennedy111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final speeds of pool balls after a collision, specifically focusing on a scenario where a white ball collides with a black ball. The initial speed of the white ball is given as 3.13 m/s, but there is confusion regarding the initial conditions of the black ball and the application of conservation of momentum. Participants emphasize the need to consider both momentum and energy conservation principles, noting that without knowing the initial speed of the black ball, the final speed cannot be accurately determined. There is also debate about the assumptions made regarding the motion of the balls before the collision. Ultimately, the consensus is that more information is needed to solve the problem correctly.
Kennedy111
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Mass of Cue stick : 595 g
Mass of White Ball: 170 g
Mass of Black Ball: 155 g

On the pool table, the white ball bounces off of the black ball and moves in the direction opposite to its original direction. If the speed of the white ball immediately after the collision is 3.13 m/s, then the speed of the black ball immediately after the collision is...?


Homework Equations


Σpi = Σpf

p =mΔv


The Attempt at a Solution


0 = (170g)(-3.13m/s) + (155g)(v)
532.1 = 155g(v)
v = 3.43 m/s

This is NOT the correct answer. Apparently the initial velocity of the white ball is not 0, but instead 3.13 m/s... I'm not sure how I find out what the final velocity of the white ball is, and without that information I don't know how to find the final velocity of the black ball... please help..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the pool table, the white ball bounces off of the black ball and moves in the direction opposite to its original direction. If the speed of the white ball immediately after the collision is 3.13 m/s, then the speed of the black ball immediately after the collision is...?
... cannot be determined: not enough information.

Your calculation appears to assume that the balls are rolling towards each other at the same magnitude momentum before the collision but the problem statement says nothing about this.
[edit] read some more ...

You found out the speed of one ball before the collision, and you have the speed of one ball after the collision ... still not enough information.

To do conservation problems start out by writing the heading "before", under that heading, sketch the "before" situation ... draw the arrows for the vectors in the proper directions and label them.
Under that, use the diagram to write out the before numbers ... in this case:
##\vec{p}_{i} = m_W \vec{v}_{Wi} + m_B \vec{v}_{Bi}##

Repeat for the "after" situation ... then write down ##\vec{p}_i=\vec{p}_f##

Then do the math.

Pool balls have extra physics that may be needed:
http://archive.ncsa.illinois.edu/Classes/MATH198/townsend/math.html
 
Last edited:
I think there's enough information if you assume that there are no energy losses, so that the total energy before and after the collision is the same.
 
The assumption of no energy losses would provide extra information... yes.
 
That was litterally all of the information they gave to me. In the answer though they have:
m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1` + m2v2`
(170g)(3.13m/s) + 0 = (170g)(-0.147 m/s) + (155g)(v2')
v2' = 3.59 m/s

I really just have no idea where they got the -0.147 m/s
 
Kennedy111 said:
On the pool table, the white ball bounces off of the black ball and moves in the direction opposite to its original direction.
This is only possible if the less massive black ball is initially moving towards the more massive white ball.

Kennedy111 said:
In the answer though they have:
m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1` + m2v2`
(170g)(3.13m/s) + 0 = (170g)(-0.147 m/s) + (155g)(v2')
v2' = 3.59 m/s
This answer seems incorrect. If the black ball initially isn't moving, then the white ball continues to move in the same direction, but at a slower speed.

Kennedy111 said:
In the answer though they have:
m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1` + m2v2`
If only momentum is conserved there should be multiple possible answers. If there are no energy losses, then you have another equation:

1/2 m1 (v1)2 + 1/2 m2 (v2)2 = 1/2 m1 (v1`)2 + 1/2 m2 (v2`)2
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top