How Do You Calculate the Kinetics of a Suspended, Unwrapping Cylinder?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GleefulNihilism
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder Kinetics
GleefulNihilism
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Well, I had a couple problems on my final I was hoping to go over- hope nobody minds. Here's the first.

Homework Statement


A uniform cylinder of radius r and mass m, wrapped around by an unstretchable and massless string, is suspended from a point. The cylinder comes down unwrapping the string and oscillating around the horizontal axis passing through the point under the action of gravity. Let l be the distance from the support point to the contact point of the string with the cylinder and phi be the angle the string forms with the vertical axis through the support point.
Find:
a.) The magnitude of the linear momentum of the cylinder.
b.) The angular momentum of the cylinder.
c.) The kinetic energy of the cylinder in terms of l, phi, dl/dt (written as l'), and d(phi)/dt (written as phi').

(Sorry, not sure how you do the fancier presentation codes.)

Homework Equations


Linear Momentum
P = (m/2)*(x'^2+y'^2)

Angular Momentum
M = I*omega

Moment of Inertia for a Uniform Cylinder
I = (mr^2)/2

Kinetic Energy
T = (P^2)/2m + (M^2)/2mr^2

The Attempt at a Solution


First, was part A.

P = (m/2)*(x'^2+y'^2)

The trick being finding x'^2 and y'^2. Preferably in terms of l, l', phi, and phi'.

Let's call the angle from the contact point on the cylinder to the center of the cylinder theta. Distance between these two points is always r- which is a constant in this problem. Woot!

So, x = l*sin(phi) + r*cos(theta) and y = l*cos(phi) + r*sin(theta).

Now, admittedly my weakest assumption, I assumed that the angle formed by the string to the contact point to the center of mass of the cylinder was usually around 90 degrees. Especially if the string wasn't close to being completely unwound. So, by method of similar triangles phi is about equal to theta.

Thus, roughly, x = l*sin(phi) + r*cos(phi) and y = l*cos(phi) + r*sin(phi).

Therefore x' = d(l*sin(phi) + r*cos(phi))/dt = l'*sin(phi) + l*phi'*cos(phi) - r*phi'*sin(phi)
Thus x'^2 = (l'*sin(phi) + l*phi'*cos(phi) - r*phi'*sin(phi))^2

And by similar arguments y'^2 = (l'*cos(phi) - l*phi'*sin(phi) + r*phi'*cos(phi))^2

So P = (m/2)*(x'^2 + y'^2)

P = (m/2)*((l'*sin(phi) + l*phi'*cos(phi) - r*phi'*sin(phi))^2 + (l'*cos(phi) - l*phi'*sin(phi) + r*phi'*cos(phi))^2)

Which expands into something that on the surface looks rather messy, but a few terms add out and other terms are simplified by the good old cos^2(theta) + sin^2(theta) = 1 identity.

So P = (m/2)*(l'^2 + l^2*phi'^2 + r^2*phi'^2 + 2*r*l'*phi'(cos^2(phi) - sin^2(phi)) - 4*r*l*phi'^2*sin(phi)*cos(phi))

B.

M=I*omega

For a uniform cylinder I = (mr^2)/2. Also known is omega = (v/r) = (P/mr)

Thus M = P*(r/2)

C.

T = (P^2)/2m + (M^2)/2mr^2

Which when you plug in P and M, do a little multiplication by constants, and you get.

T = (5m/32)*(l'^2 + l^2*phi'^2 + r^2*phi'^2 + 2*r*l'*phi'(cos^2(phi) - sin^2(phi)) - 4*r*l*phi'^2*sin(phi)*cos(phi))^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No bites, eh?

Well, if it helps I don't need to be taken by the hand. I just want to see how the professor got these answers.

A) P = m*sprt((l'-r*phi')^2 + l^2*phi'^2)

B.) M = (3/2)*m*r*(l' - r*phi')

C.) T = (3/4)*m*(l'-r*phi')^2 + (m/2)*l^2*phi'^2
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top