How Do You Calculate the Orbital Period of a Satellite?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the orbital period of a satellite with a perigee of 100 nautical miles and an apogee of 600 nautical miles, the semi-major axis (A) is determined to be 648.2 km using the equation rp + ra = 2A. The period is then calculated using the formula Period = (2*pi/sqrt(mu)) * A^(2/3), but there is confusion regarding the units of the resulting period. The gravitational parameter mu for Earth is used, and it's noted that AU is typically used for solar orbits, not for satellites orbiting Earth. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the Earth's radius in calculations and suggests converting all measurements to consistent units for clarity.
oneredballoon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An Earth satellite is observed to have a height of perigee of 100 n mi and a height of apogee of 600 n mi. Find the period of the orbit.

Homework Equations



(1) Period = (2*pi/sqrt(mu)) * A^(2/3)
(2) rp+ra = 2A

Where:
Mu is the Standard Gravitational Parameter 4X10^5 (km^3/s^2)
rp is radius of periapsis
ra is radius of apoapsis
A is the semi-major axis of an elliptic orbit.


The Attempt at a Solution


I converted nautical miles to km, and used equation (2) to obtain A=648.2 km.
(185.2km+1111.2km)=2A; A =648.2km

I then plugged my value of A into the Period equation to obtain an answer of .744.
I can't quite figure out the units for this number. It looks like it would be seconds, but that seems like a pretty unreasonable solution if it is.

I know orbital periods are usually calculated in AU, but if I calculate in AU, I don't know what to do with the constant Mu, which is in km^3/s^2.

Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An astronomical unit (AU) is the distance from the Earth to the sun, and it is not a measure of time.

In your original calculations, what happened to the Earth when you were figuring the dimensions of the orbit?
 
I should have phrased that better; I meant that the distances are usually in AU, not the period.

I'm not sure if I understand what you mean by "what happened to the earth"...the Earth's mass is taken into account in Mu which is G*M where G is the gravitational constant, and M is the mass of the earth.
 
oneredballoon said:
I should have phrased that better; I meant that the distances are usually in AU, not the period.

I'm not sure if I understand what you mean by "what happened to the earth"...the Earth's mass is taken into account in Mu which is G*M where G is the gravitational constant, and M is the mass of the earth.

Does 648 km look like a reasonable semimajor axis for a satellite circling the Earth? What's the diameter of the Earth in km?

AU distance units are commonly used when the object is orbiting the Sun. The assumption then is that you'll be using the Sun's gravitational parameter, \mu_{Sun}, and time units of about 58.13 days (yes, I know it looks odd!).

Since your satellite is orbiting the Earth you could use the appropriate canonical units: The distance unit DU is the radius of the Earth, the time unit TU is \sqrt{\frac{DU^3}{\mu_{Earth}}}, about 806.82 seconds. Alternatively, simply convert everything to mks units and proceed. Unless you're specifically doing work in astrodynamics, you'll probably find the latter option preferable.
 
Thank you for the response!

My problem was that I hadn't taken into account the radius of the earth. (I also typed the formula above incorrectly.)

Interestingly enough, this was a homework problem for my Astrodynamics class.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top