How Do You Calculate the Original Mass in a Relativistic Disintegration Problem?

AI Thread Summary
In a relativistic disintegration problem, a body at rest disintegrates into two fragments with masses of 3.0 kg and 4.0 kg, moving at velocities of 0.8c and 0.6c, respectively. The original mass of the body is calculated using the conservation of energy and momentum principles, but initial attempts yield incorrect results. It becomes clear that the mass-energy of the fragments must also be accounted for, not just their kinetic energy. The correct original mass is determined to be 10 kg, highlighting the importance of considering both kinetic and rest mass energy in such calculations. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving relativistic problems accurately.
Je m'appelle
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A body at rest in a frame of reference S disintegrates into two pieces moving in opposite directions. The masses of each fragment are 3.0kg and 4.0kg and their velocities 0.8c and 0.6c, respectively. Find the mass of the body before it disintegrated. (Answer: 10kg)

Homework Equations



1. Energy-momentum relation
E^2 = (pc)^2 + (m_0 c^2)^2

2. Relativistic kinetic energy equation
E_{ki} = m_i c^2 \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_i^2}{c^2}}} -1 \right)

3. Relativistic momentum equation
p_i = \frac{m_i v_i}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_i^2}{c^2}}}

The Attempt at a Solution



First I tried using conservation of energy, by taking the energy of the body at rest (1.), with p=0, and equating it to the sum of the kinetic energies of the two fragments (2.), which looked like this

m_0c^2 = m_1c^2 \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v_1^2}{c^2}}} - 1 \right) + m_2c^2 \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v_2^2}{c^2}}} - 1 \right)

This yields m_0 = 3 \ kg which doesn't make sense.

Then it occurred to me that since I already have the answer (10 kg), which was provided in the problem, and both fragments sum up to 7 kg then there's 3 kg of mass missing, so I'm clearly skipping something here.

Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I can see, you seem to be ignoring the mass-energy of the two pieces that fly apart - I think you're only considering their kinetic energy.
 
  • Like
Likes Je m'appelle and PeroK
tomdodd4598 said:
As far as I can see, you seem to be ignoring the mass-energy of the two pieces that fly apart - I think you're only considering their kinetic energy.

You're absolutely right! Thank you, tomdodd4598
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top