How Do You Calculate the Oscillation Frequency of a Compressed Rubber Pad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Barrowlands
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring Units
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the oscillation frequency of a compressed rubber pad, the angular frequency ω can be derived using the formula ω = sqrt(k/m), where k is the spring constant and m is the mass of the object. The spring constant k can be expressed as k = mg/x0, with x0 being the displacement of the pad. Substituting this into the angular frequency formula results in ω = sqrt(g/x0). The units of this equation yield radians per second, confirming that the frequency can be calculated using f = ω/(2π). The discussion clarifies the relationship between angular frequency and frequency while addressing unit consistency in the calculations.
Barrowlands
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So, I'm trying to brush up on my undergrad physics, and I'm sure this is a bone-headed question, so please bear with me.

Homework Statement


A heavy object, when placed on a rubber pad that is to be used as a shock absorber, compresses the pad by 1cm. If the object is given a vertical tap, it will oscillate. Ignoring the damping, estimate the oscillation frequency. [The book I'm using actually gives the solution]

Homework Equations


x(t)=A*sin(sqrt(k/m)t+\phi)
ω=sqrt(k/m)
F=k|l-l0|

The Attempt at a Solution


We'll call x0 the equilibrium displacement, x0=1cm
k=spring constant of rubber
so
k(l-l0)=k*x0=mg (equilibrium)
gives us
k=(mg)/(x0)
then
ω=sqrt(k/m)
which eventually solves to
ω=sqrt(g/x0)

The book gives an answer of sqrt(980) rad/s. My question is given the units from ω=sqrt(g/x0) (meters, seconds, centimeters), how do they arrive at radians?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
X0 is 0.01 m. So the unit of sqrt(g/x0) is 1/s.
ω is the angular frequency, it is measured in radians/second, but radian is dimensionless. ω=2πf (f=frequency).

ehild
 
Makes sense. I actually just beefed the algebra cancelling my units. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top