How Do You Calculate the Percentage Yield of Copper Carbonate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter imapeiceofwod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Yield
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the percentage yield of copper carbonate, first determine the theoretical mass of copper carbonate produced by finding the number of moles of sodium carbonate and using the mole ratio from the balanced equation. Since sodium carbonate is in excess, ensure that copper sulfate is the limiting reagent, which may require knowing its concentration. Once the theoretical mass is calculated, use the formula for percentage yield: (actual yield/theoretical yield) x 100. This approach will provide the correct percent yield for the reaction. Accurate calculations depend on understanding the stoichiometry involved.
imapeiceofwod
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I'm given that

Copper sulfate + sodium carbonate --> copper carbonate + sodium sulfate.

Mass of Sodium Carbonate 1.460g
Volume of copper sulfate 28.50 mL
Actual yield of copper carbonate is 0.15g

The question is using your data and knowing that sodium carbonate was in excess calculate the percent yield reaction with respect to the copper carbonate precipitate.

From my understand i got to find the theoretical mass of copper carbonate produced correct? but how? Would i just find the number of moles of sodium carbonate use the mole ratio to find the moles of copper carbonate. then from their find its mass. then use the % yield formula
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can be right, you can be also wrong. You have to check if it is not a limiting reagent problem. But in general you are on the right track.

I suppose you know concentration of copper sulfate solution?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top