How Do You Calculate the Resistance of a Copper Sheet Given Its Dimensions?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the resistance of a copper sheet, the formula R = ρL/A is used, where ρ is the resistivity, L is the length, and A is the cross-sectional area. Given a volume of 1 cm³ and a thickness of 0.5 mm, assumptions about the sheet's shape are necessary to determine L and A. The discussion highlights that the resistance also depends on the orientation of the current flow through the sheet. For a rectangular piece of copper, if the current flows along the longest dimension, the resistance can be calculated accordingly. Understanding these parameters is crucial for accurate resistance calculations in conductive materials.
T7
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Part of a question I am working on asks me to "calculate the resistance of 1cm^3 of copper in the form of a thin sheet 0.5mm thick (between the faces of the sheet), given a resistivity of 1.69x10^-8 Ohm metres".

Given that p = RA/L, it is clear that R = pL/A = 1.69x10^-8 x L/A. So far, so good. But I am not sure that I can obtain L and A from merely a volume (1cm^3) and a thickness without making some assumption about its shape (a square sheet, perhaps)? Am I missing something?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
T7,

What's the resistance of a 1cm x 2cm x 3cm piece of copper?
 
jdavel said:
T7,

What's the resistance of a 1cm x 2cm x 3cm piece of copper?

Doesn't it depend on which side the current is going through (ie. which sides make up the area)?
 
t7,

"Doesn't it depend on which side the current is going through (ie. which sides make up the area)?"

Absolutely! So, let's say the current is in the direction of the longest dimension (3cm). What's the resistance of that "wire"?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top