How Do You Calculate the Solubility of PbI2 in .300m AlI3?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the solubility of PbI2 in a 0.300m AlI3 solution, the dissociation equation must be correctly formulated, as combining separate reactions is not valid. The equilibrium expression should incorporate the concentrations of Pb and I ions, considering the excess iodide from AlI3. The initial calculation of 6.67M for PbI2 is deemed incorrect due to the low solubility of PbI2, indicated by its Ksp value of 2.0x10-30. Participants emphasize the importance of showing work for accurate assessment and understanding. Properly addressing these points will lead to a more accurate calculation of PbI2 solubility.
AKilren
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hey all, I'm new here, so hello to all of you.
Question: "Calculate the solubility of PbI2 in .300m AlI3
(PbI2 - Ksp = 2.0x10-30)"
So I'm not really sure how to do the symbols and such, but that's a try.
Now I'm seeing it two ways. One: Right a disassociation equation as PbI2 + AlI3 <---> Al + I + Pb
I'm too lazy to do the little numbers next to it right now, but you get the idea. Then I would write a Equilibrium expression as 2.0X10-30 = [Pb][Al]...
In all honesty I'm really lost. I missed a couple days of this unit and I'm quite behind. Any help would be highly, highly appreciated.
Thank you
AK



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are dissolving PbI2 in th excess amount of I-.
 
OK. So by doing that the molarity of I in the equation would be .300 because there is already so much of it, or its saturated with I already. So it seems to me that what I need to do is complete the Equilibrium Expression, but my other question is was my Dissassociation equation right?
Thank you for the prompt response,
AK
 
AKilren said:
molarity of I in the equation would be .300

No. How many moles of I- per mole of AlI3?

my other question is was my Dissassociation equation right?

No. You can't combine two separate reactions in one equation.
 
OK so I think I understand this and have worked through it. My final answer was 6.67M PbI2
Is that remotely correct?
Thanks
AK
 
I am afraid it is incorrect at first sight, 6.67M is a highly concentrated solution, while PbI2 is very weakly soluble.

Show your work.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top