How Do You Calculate the Spring Constant in Van der Waals Potential?

Fr3shFr0st
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The van der Waals potential between two inert atoms is often characterized by the expression:

http://bama.ua.edu/~stjones/253hw_files/image025.gif

Sketch the function. Expand the potential around the minimum in the form U = U(ro) + ½ k(r-ro)2. Evaluate k in terms of s and e.

Homework Equations


Above

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the sketch down fine. I am just unclear about the second part. Nothing in my physics textbook helps. What i have done so far is take the original equation and substitute it in
U = U(ro) + ½ k(r-ro)2. Doing that i got:

U = 4e[(σ/ro)^12-(σ/ro)^6] + ½ k(r-ro)2

From there i solved for k and got:

k={U-[4e[(σ/ro)^12-(σ/ro)^6]]/(r-ro)^2}*2

Im not sure if I am the right path but from here i don't know how to get k in terms of s and e. Any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with Taylor Series expansions (from when you took calculus)? That's the key to solving this one.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top