How Do You Calculate the System Matrix for a Lens After a Beam Waist?

girlinphysics
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin lens is placed 2m after the beam waist. The lens has f = 200mm. Find the appropriate system matrix.

This is a past exam question I want to check I got right.

Homework Equations


For some straight section [[1 , d],[0 , 1]] and for a thin lens [[1 , 0],[-1/f , 1]]

The Attempt at a Solution


[[r2],[r2']] = [[1 , d],[0 , 1]] [[1 , 0],[-1/f , 1]] [[r1],[r1']]

I multiplied the two matrices and found [[1-d/f, d] , [-1/f , 1]]

Is this correct? Or am I meant to add an additional straight section after the lens? I get confused as to when to use the straight section matrix. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
girlinphysics said:
[[1 , d],[0 , 1]] [[1 , 0],[-1/f , 1]] [[r1],[r1']]
You made a mistake here. The free propagation should come first, then followed by the lens.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
You made a mistake here. The free propagation should come first, then followed by the lens.
Oh okay, thank you very much for your help!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top