How Do You Calculate the Time Ratio for Two Jumping Heights on a Trampoline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ian_durrant
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the time ratio for two students bouncing on a trampoline, the equation y=V(0)t + (1/2)gt^2 is used, where y represents displacement. Anne bounces 2.61 times higher than Joan, leading to a proposed ratio of their displacements. The calculations initially resulted in negative time values, indicating a misinterpretation of the frame of reference. Adjusting the reference point to ensure positive values for upward motion resolves the issue. Ultimately, the time ratio can be determined without needing to multiply by 2, as the ratio will remain consistent.
ian_durrant
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Acceleration/Velocity Problem

Homework Statement



Two students, Anne and Joan, are bouncing straight up and down on a trampoline. Anne bounces 2.61 times as high as Joan does. Assuming both are in free-fall, find the ratio of the time Anne spends between bounces to the time Joan spends.

Homework Equations



y=V(0)t+ (1/2)gt^2


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok I figured that if Anne is jumping 2.61 times as high as Joan, I could set y (the displacement) as 2.61 for Anne and 1 for Joan. However I plugged the numbers into the equation and ended up getting a negative answer for my time, which doesn't make sense. Here's my equations that I used:

Anne-

2.61=(1/2)(-9.8)t^2
-.53=t^2

Joan-

1=(1/2)(-9.8)t^2
-.204=t^2

I figured what I would do after i got the time is to multiple them both by 2 since I only calcuated them returning for the highest point to lowest point, then plugging them into a ratio. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
right method, and you won't have to multiple both by 2 since the ratio will cancel that out anyway
 
good point about the ratio, but I'm still confused why I'm going to have a negative number for t, or would this not matter anyways?
 
Hi...

You might want to think twice about your frame of reference. I work well positive as up and negative is down. But it looks like you work the same way as well since your acceleration is negative. That would mean that your initial location is higher than your final. No matter where you make your y=0...y(initial)>y(final). That is why you are getting a negative.
 
thanks for all the help everyone
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top