How Do You Calculate the Time Ratio for Two Jumping Heights on a Trampoline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ian_durrant
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the time ratio for two students bouncing on a trampoline, the equation y=V(0)t + (1/2)gt^2 is used, where y represents displacement. Anne bounces 2.61 times higher than Joan, leading to a proposed ratio of their displacements. The calculations initially resulted in negative time values, indicating a misinterpretation of the frame of reference. Adjusting the reference point to ensure positive values for upward motion resolves the issue. Ultimately, the time ratio can be determined without needing to multiply by 2, as the ratio will remain consistent.
ian_durrant
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Acceleration/Velocity Problem

Homework Statement



Two students, Anne and Joan, are bouncing straight up and down on a trampoline. Anne bounces 2.61 times as high as Joan does. Assuming both are in free-fall, find the ratio of the time Anne spends between bounces to the time Joan spends.

Homework Equations



y=V(0)t+ (1/2)gt^2


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok I figured that if Anne is jumping 2.61 times as high as Joan, I could set y (the displacement) as 2.61 for Anne and 1 for Joan. However I plugged the numbers into the equation and ended up getting a negative answer for my time, which doesn't make sense. Here's my equations that I used:

Anne-

2.61=(1/2)(-9.8)t^2
-.53=t^2

Joan-

1=(1/2)(-9.8)t^2
-.204=t^2

I figured what I would do after i got the time is to multiple them both by 2 since I only calcuated them returning for the highest point to lowest point, then plugging them into a ratio. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
right method, and you won't have to multiple both by 2 since the ratio will cancel that out anyway
 
good point about the ratio, but I'm still confused why I'm going to have a negative number for t, or would this not matter anyways?
 
Hi...

You might want to think twice about your frame of reference. I work well positive as up and negative is down. But it looks like you work the same way as well since your acceleration is negative. That would mean that your initial location is higher than your final. No matter where you make your y=0...y(initial)>y(final). That is why you are getting a negative.
 
thanks for all the help everyone
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top