How Do You Calculate the Time Ratio for Two Jumping Heights on a Trampoline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ian_durrant
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the time ratio for two students bouncing on a trampoline, the equation y=V(0)t + (1/2)gt^2 is used, where y represents displacement. Anne bounces 2.61 times higher than Joan, leading to a proposed ratio of their displacements. The calculations initially resulted in negative time values, indicating a misinterpretation of the frame of reference. Adjusting the reference point to ensure positive values for upward motion resolves the issue. Ultimately, the time ratio can be determined without needing to multiply by 2, as the ratio will remain consistent.
ian_durrant
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Acceleration/Velocity Problem

Homework Statement



Two students, Anne and Joan, are bouncing straight up and down on a trampoline. Anne bounces 2.61 times as high as Joan does. Assuming both are in free-fall, find the ratio of the time Anne spends between bounces to the time Joan spends.

Homework Equations



y=V(0)t+ (1/2)gt^2


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok I figured that if Anne is jumping 2.61 times as high as Joan, I could set y (the displacement) as 2.61 for Anne and 1 for Joan. However I plugged the numbers into the equation and ended up getting a negative answer for my time, which doesn't make sense. Here's my equations that I used:

Anne-

2.61=(1/2)(-9.8)t^2
-.53=t^2

Joan-

1=(1/2)(-9.8)t^2
-.204=t^2

I figured what I would do after i got the time is to multiple them both by 2 since I only calcuated them returning for the highest point to lowest point, then plugging them into a ratio. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
right method, and you won't have to multiple both by 2 since the ratio will cancel that out anyway
 
good point about the ratio, but I'm still confused why I'm going to have a negative number for t, or would this not matter anyways?
 
Hi...

You might want to think twice about your frame of reference. I work well positive as up and negative is down. But it looks like you work the same way as well since your acceleration is negative. That would mean that your initial location is higher than your final. No matter where you make your y=0...y(initial)>y(final). That is why you are getting a negative.
 
thanks for all the help everyone
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top