How Do You Calculate the Total Distance Traveled by a Car with Variable Speeds?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the total distance traveled by a car with variable speeds, the discussion outlines three distinct phases: acceleration, constant speed, and deceleration. The car accelerates from 0 to 19.4 m/s in 10 seconds, covering 95 meters, then maintains that speed for 11 seconds, adding 213.4 meters. During deceleration over 3 seconds, the calculation of distance is incorrect as it fails to account for the initial speed of 19.4 m/s. The correct approach for the third phase should include this initial velocity, leading to a revised total distance calculation. The total distance traveled, as initially calculated, is 336.1 meters, but adjustments are needed for accuracy.
Hoejer
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to calculate the traveled length of a car.

A traveling car with a acceleration from 0 m/s to 19.4 m/s in 10 sec. From there it has a speed of 19.4 m/s for 11 sec. After the 21 sec. the car hit the brakes, and deaccelerates to 0m/s in 3 sec.


Homework Equations


s=-1/2*a*t^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I find the acceleration in the to periods first

Acceleration = 19.4/10sec = 1.9 m/s^2
Deacceleration = -19.4/3sec. = -6-47 m/s^2


The I want to divide the traveled length for each individual timeperiod.

The first period (10 s) is = 1/2 * 1.9 * 10^2 = 95 meters
Seceond period (11 s) is = 19.4*11 = 213.4 meters
Third period (3 s) = -1/2*-6.47*3 = 9.7 meters

Travelled distance in all = 95+213.4+9.7 = 336.1 meters.

Is this correct?!




And yes I'm new here, so hello to everyone. Hope this can help me be better at phys/maths. I'm starting engineering soon, so I better get this handled!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The complete equation is s=ut+\frac{1}{2}at^2.
For the first time period u=0 so your result looks ok, but for the third the initial velocity is u=19.4m/s which you havn't taken into consideration.
 
Isn't that given in the deacceleration?

Deacceleration = -19.4/3sec. = -6-47 m/s^2 ?


Otherwise a hint would be cool!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top