How Do You Calculate the Wavelength of Particle Motion in Parametric Equations?

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
I have two parametric equations for the speed of a particle in a plane:

\dot{x}(t) = A \left( 1 - cos{\Omega t} \right)
\dot{y}(t) = A sin{\Omega t}

The period is equal to \Omega. How do I find the wavelength of the motion?


The wavelength is just \lambda = \Omega v, where v = \sqrt{\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2} is the speed, right? But then the wavelength is not time invariant. Could my answer

\lambda = \Omega A \left( 2 - 2cos{\Omega t} \right)^{1/2}

really be correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here omega is not the period, but the angular velocity = 2pi/T where T is the period.
 
I thought about that too, but it's stated in the problem that the motion is periodic with period \Omega. Anyway, my question still remains.
 
Logarythmic said:
I thought about that too, but it's stated in the problem that the motion is periodic with period \Omega. Anyway, my question still remains.
Is this problem in a textbook, or was it given by a professor or teacher?

\Omega as a period would seem to be incorrect since normally the arguments of sine and cosine are dimensionless, which is consistent with rl.bhat's comment.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top