How Do You Calculate Time Difference in Different Inertial Systems?

jimmypoopins
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two events occur in an inertial system at the same time, but 9000 km apart. However in another inertial system these two events are observed to be 11000 km apart.

What is the time difference between the two events in this second inertial system?


Homework Equations


s^2=x^2+y^2+z^2-(ct)^2


The Attempt at a Solution


since the spacetime interval is invariant in any inertial frame, s^2 can equal s'^2
for the first inertial system i got s^2=9m^2
putting it into the second equation i got
9m^2=11m^2-(ct)^2
subtracting 11m^2, dividing by -c, and taking the square root, i am left with 2.108*10^-8sec, which seems like it could be a reasonable answer, but it is not correct.

can anyone tell me what i am doing wrong and lead me in the right direction please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimmypoopins said:

Homework Statement


Two events occur in an inertial system at the same time, but 9000 km apart. However in another inertial system these two events are observed to be 11000 km apart.

What is the time difference between the two events in this second inertial system?


Homework Equations


s^2=x^2+y^2+z^2-(ct)^2


The Attempt at a Solution


since the spacetime interval is invariant in any inertial frame, s^2 can equal s'^2
for the first inertial system i got s^2=9m^2
putting it into the second equation i got
9m^2=11m^2-(ct)^2
subtracting 11m^2, dividing by -c, and taking the square root, i am left with 2.108*10^-8sec, which seems like it could be a reasonable answer, but it is not correct.

can anyone tell me what i am doing wrong and lead me in the right direction please?

You have the right idea, it just seems that you are making some algebra mistake. First, it is 9000 km apart so 9 \times 10^6 m. Second, when solving for the time interval in the other frame, you must divide by the square of c before taking the square root.
 
ah you are right, thank you. for some reason when i saw 4000km i assumed that i had to divide by 1000 to get it in meters. i don't know why, a stupid mistake on my part.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top