How Do You Calculate Velocity at Equilibrium in Simple Harmonic Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chazgurl4life
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vibrations Waves
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the velocity at equilibrium in simple harmonic motion, the maximum velocity can be determined using the equation vmax = 2π * Amplitude * Frequency. The amplitude is known (0.16 m), and the frequency is given as 2.0 Hz. The relationship between frequency and the spring constant k is also discussed, with the formula K = (2π * Frequency)² * Mass. Additionally, the conservation of energy method can be employed to find velocity, combining kinetic and potential energy. Understanding these equations and methods is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
chazgurl4life
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
A 0.55 kg mass at the end of a spring vibrates 2.0 times per second with an amplitude of 0.16 m.
(a) Determine the velocity when it passes the equilibrium point.
I have no idea how to figure this out

i mean to figure out velocity ...we use this equstion vmax= 2pi*Amplitude* Frequency

I ahve the amplitude but no frequency..im i using the right process?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is the frequency of oscillation related to the spring constant k? What else determines the frequency of oscillation? Once you have k, do you have what you need to figure out the midpoint velocity? You can also do it with energy conservation (KE + PE = constant)...
 
Ok so i know that K= (2pi*freq.)^2* mass and then once i have K i can uses vmax= 2pi Af and solve for A?
 
chazgurl4life said:
Ok so i know that K= (2pi*freq.)^2* mass and then once i have K i can uses vmax= 2pi Af and solve for A?
I thought you had the amplitude and frequency already. What is the SHM equation for the motion of the object in terms of the mass, spring constant k, amplitude and frequency?

y(t) = something * sin( something * t )

And then you can get the velocity by differentiating, right? Or else just take the easy way out and use the conservation of energy method that I mentioned.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top