How Do You Derive the Period of a Pendulum with Arbitrary Amplitude?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the period of a pendulum with arbitrary amplitude, starting from the equation of motion, \ddot{\theta} = -\sin(\theta). The user successfully derives an expression for the pendulum's velocity and sets up an integral to calculate the period, initially integrating from the amplitude \theta_0 to 0. They reach an expression that resembles the desired form but struggle to find the correct substitution or identity to match the integrand and limits. The conversation references a Wikipedia article for additional context on the mathematical treatment of pendulum motion. The thread highlights the complexities involved in deriving the period for non-small amplitudes.
StrangelyQuarky
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A pendulum obeys the equation \ddot{\theta} = -\sin(\theta) and has amplitude \theta_0. I have to show that the period is
T = 4 \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{d\phi}{\sqrt{1-\alpha \sin^2(\phi)}} where \alpha = \sin^2(\frac{\theta_0}{2})

2. The attempt at a solution

I derived an expression for time:

\dot{\theta}\frac{d\dot{\theta}}{d\theta} = -\sin(\theta)

I said that the pendulum starts out at the height of its amplitude \theta = \theta_0 where it also has zero velocity

\int_{0}^{\dot{\theta}} \dot{\theta}d\dot{\theta} = \int_{\theta_0}^{\theta} -\sin(\theta)d\theta

\dot{\theta} = \frac{d\theta}{dt}= \pm \sqrt{2(\cos(\theta)-\cos(\theta_0))}

So for the period we can integrate from \theta_0 \text{ to } 0, which is a quarter of the period, then multiply by 4 to get the whole period.

T = 4 \int_{\theta_0}^{0} \frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{2(\cos(\theta)-\cos(\theta_0))}}

By the half-angle identity,

T = 2 \int_{\theta_0}^{0} \frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{\sin^2(\theta_0 /2)-\sin^2(\theta /2)}} = 2 \int_{\theta_0}^{0} \frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{\alpha-\sin^2(\theta /2)}}

And this is where I'm stuck. It looks similar to the desired answer, but I can't think of any identity or substitution that would give the right integrand and limits.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top