How Do You Determine Image Location and Type Using a Spherical Mirror Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter positron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirror Reflection
AI Thread Summary
To determine the image location using a spherical mirror equation, the magnification formula si/so = 2 indicates that the image is upright and virtual, while real images are inverted. The equation 1/so + 1/si = 1/f can be confusing due to varying conventions for signs in lenses versus mirrors. For concave mirrors, any real image will be inverted, and any virtual image will be upright, with the image distance typically being negative. Understanding these conventions is crucial, as they stem from the geometric nature of optics. Ultimately, recognizing that virtual images are always upright and real images are always inverted clarifies the application of these equations.
positron
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
If you place an object a distance so from a spherical mirror, how do you calculate the image location given that the image is right side up and magnified by two times? I know the equation but I always get confused about what signs to use for lenses vs. mirrors, etc.

I know the magnification is si/so = 2. I don't understand how to determine whether the image should be virtual or real, from the equation 1/so+1/si = 1/f. Maybe if someone can show me how to use this equation in the context of a reflecting mirror I will understand how to do the problem.
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
With a spherical mirror that is concave (the magnifying kind) any image that is "real" will be inverted. Any image that is upright will be virtual.

In this case the magnification is 2.0, and image distance will be a negative value according to convention.
 
Chi Meson said:
With a spherical mirror that is concave (the magnifying kind) any image that is "real" will be inverted. Any image that is upright will be virtual.

In this case the magnification is 2.0, and image distance will be a negative value according to convention.

How do you know that any image that is real is inverted and that any image that is virtual is upright, based on the equation? I know I can just memorize this fact, but is there another way to think about it?
 
It is a fact. The equation is modified to fit the fact. Unfortunately, the equation changes depending on the text. In many cases the magnification equation is: m=si/so=-hi/ho where the negative is thrown into have a "positive magnification" indicate a real image.

Sometimes the negative is left out in order to have a negative magnification indicate an inverted image.

These are only conventions (something people agreed to do). But to repeat: it starts as a fact, due to the simple geometric nature of basic *single* lens or *single* mirror optics, virtual images are always upright, real images are always inverted.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top