How Do You Determine Normal Mode Frequencies in a Coupled Oscillator System?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining normal mode frequencies in a coupled oscillator system described by a specific Lagrangian. The Euler-Lagrange equations were applied to derive motion equations for both x and y coordinates, leading to a coupled system of second-order differential equations. The user is uncertain about the next steps to find the frequencies, questioning whether to treat x and y as separate solutions or to transform to polar coordinates. A suggestion was made to express the solutions in exponential form to derive a system of linear equations, which can yield non-trivial solutions for specific frequencies. Proper formatting of equations was also emphasized to enhance clarity in communication.
Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



We have a particle of mass m moving in a plane described by the following Lagrangian:
\frac{1}{2}m((\dot{x}^2)+(\dot{y}^2)+2(\alpha)(\dot{x})(\dot{y}))-\frac{1}{2}k(x^2+y^2+(\beta)xy) for k>0 is a spring constant and \alpha and \beta are time-independent.

Find the normal mode frequencies, \omega_1,2

Homework Equations



Euler-Lagrange Equation

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I'm just missing here. There was a lot of math, so I won't explicitly write out all of it, but I will have my final answers. I used the Euler-Lagrange Equation twice: once for x, once for y. This yielded:

m*ddot{x}+m\alpha(\ddot{y}=-kx+\beta(y)
and
m*\ddot{y}+m\alpha(\ddot{x}=-ky+\beta(x)

I solved each for \ddot{x} and equated them, giving me:

\ddot{y} = \frac{\beta+k/(\alpha)}{m(\alpha-1/(\alpha))}*y + \frac{-k-\beta/(\alpha)}{m(\alpha-1/(\alpha))}*x

Am I approaching this the right way to find the frequencies? I know usually in 1D for example, you solve the Euler-Lagrange equation to yield something of the form: \ddot{x}=\omega^2*x, but it is a little more unclear to me as to what to do here. Would I find two separate frequencies, once in x and once in y and they are two separate answers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Update: I should probably transform to coordinates like (r,theta) and find theta dot, right?
 
Yosty22 said:

Homework Statement



We have a particle of mass m moving in a plane described by the following Lagrangian:
\frac{1}{2}m((\dot{x}^2)+(\dot{y}^2)+2(\alpha)(\dot{x})(\dot{y}))-\frac{1}{2}k(x^2+y^2+(\beta)xy) for k>0 is a spring constant and \alpha and \beta are time-independent.

Find the normal mode frequencies, \omega_1,2

Homework Equations



Euler-Lagrange Equation

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I'm just missing here. There was a lot of math, so I won't explicitly write out all of it, but I will have my final answers. I used the Euler-Lagrange Equation twice: once for x, once for y. This yielded:

m*ddot{x}+m\alpha(\ddot{y}=-kx+\beta(y)
and
m*\ddot{y}+m\alpha(\ddot{x}=-ky+\beta(x)

I solved each for \ddot{x} and equated them, giving me:

\ddot{y} = \frac{\beta+k/(\alpha)}{m(\alpha-1/(\alpha))}*y + \frac{-k-\beta/(\alpha)}{m(\alpha-1/(\alpha))}*x

Am I approaching this the right way to find the frequencies? I know usually in 1D for example, you solve the Euler-Lagrange equation to yield something of the form: \ddot{x}=\omega^2*x, but it is a little more unclear to me as to what to do here. Would I find two separate frequencies, once in x and once in y and they are two separate answers?

Perhaps if you presented the TeX/LaTeX expressions properly you would receive more responses. I edited the first of your equations above. The first one below is exactly what you wrote, but inserting the appropriate controls to make the PF processor understand you want to use LaTeX. As you can see, it looks ugly, and defeats the whole purpose of using LaTeX in the first place. The second one is the properly-edited version, in which all needed control characters are used. Right-click on it to see the TeX commands.

m*ddot{x}+m\alpha(\ddot{y}=-kx+\beta(y)

m \ddot{x}+m\alpha \ddot{y}=-kx+\beta y
 
Yosty22 said:

Homework Statement



We have a particle of mass m moving in a plane described by the following Lagrangian:
##\frac{1}{2}m((\dot{x}^2)+(\dot{y}^2)+2(\alpha)(\dot{x})(\dot{y}))-\frac{1}{2}k(x^2+y^2+(\beta)xy)##
for k>0 is a spring constant and \alpha and \beta are time-independent.

Find the normal mode frequencies, \omega_1,2

Homework Equations



Euler-Lagrange Equation

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I'm just missing here. There was a lot of math, so I won't explicitly write out all of it, but I will have my final answers. I used the Euler-Lagrange Equation twice: once for x, once for y. This yielded:

##m\ddot{x}+m\alpha\ddot{y}=-k(x+\beta y)##
and
##m\ddot{y}+m\alpha \ddot{y}=-k(y +\beta x) ##

I solved each for \ddot{x} and equated them, giving me:

##\ddot{y} = \frac{\beta+k/(\alpha)}{m(\alpha-1/(\alpha))}*y + \frac{-k-\beta/(\alpha)}{m(\alpha-1/(\alpha))}*x##

Am I approaching this the right way to find the frequencies? I know usually in 1D for example, you solve the Euler-Lagrange equation to yield something of the form: \ddot{x}=\omega^2*x, but it is a little more unclear to me as to what to do here. Would I find two separate frequencies, once in x and once in y and they are two separate answers?
Check your equations. I corrected your TeX codes. Is not a factor of 2 in front of beta in the Lagrangian?
Find the solution in form ##x=x_0 e^{i\omega t}##, ##y=y_0 e^{i\omega t} ##. You get a system of linear homogeneous equations for xo and yo that has nonzero solution for certain ω-as only.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top