How Do You Determine the Unit Vector in Coulomb's Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter laura_a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
AI Thread Summary
To determine the unit vector in Coulomb's Law for the force exerted by charge q1 at (1,0) on charge q2 at (0,1), the distance between the two charges is calculated as sqrt(2). The unit vector r is expressed as -sqrt(2)/2 i + sqrt(2)/2 j, where the negative sign indicates the direction of the force towards the negative x-axis. Understanding that r is a unit vector with a magnitude of one helps clarify the division by 2, as 1/sqrt(2) equals sqrt(2)/2. The discussion highlights the importance of vector notation and the relationship between position and displacement vectors in physics. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a solid grasp of vector concepts to apply Coulomb's Law effectively.
laura_a
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am a maths teacher retraining in physics, haven't received my textbook yet but attempting the course work, I have the answer to this question and the mathematic skills to solve it, but the notes don't give any worked examples so I have no idea how to go from the law to the answer.

q. A charge q1 is located at x=1 m, y=0. What should you use for the unit vector r in Coulomb's law if you are calculating the force that q1 exerts on charge q2 located at the point x=0 y=1m



Homework Equations



The law I have is F_{12}=[(kq1q2)/r^2]r

The Attempt at a Solution



And I understand the question wants a vector answer and with my maths skills I drew the points and worked out that the distance from q1 to q2 is sqrt(2) and I know the answer is the vector

-sqrt(2)/2 i + sqrt(2)/2 j

Where does the negative come from and why is it over 2? I know this is a silly question but my lecture notes go from the law to this question. I assume the textbook will shed more light but I was just trying to understand this part before moving on.

Thanks to anyone that has time for this :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If q1 is exerting a charge on q2 then what direction is the force acting? Hopefully that will clear up the minus sign troubles.

Also, since r is a UNIT vector it must have a magnitude of one and yet still have the same direction. edit: Keep in mind \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}
edit : I should also add that this question doesn't really have anything to do with the law. It is a vector question rather than a force calculation, which would require the use of Coulomb's Law.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I realize I have a lot to learn about physics. I realize 1/sqrt(2)=sqrt(2)/2 now that you point it out! But I guess I have no concept of vectors really so I am really in the deep end.

Would it be coincidental that the gradient of the line joining q1 and q2 be negative and the direction gives it a negative sign? Also what are the i and j part of the vector?
I don't even know that part! :(
 
The negative sign is because the arrow is pointing in the negative x direction. I suppose that might be linked with the gradient somehow but I'm too tired to see it at the moment.

A vector can be represented a number of different ways:Simply <x,y> or (x,y) depending on notation is just the location of the tip of the arrow, usually from the origin.

Vectors can also be written as:
x\hat{i} + y\hat{j}

and that means the exact same as my previous notation. i j (and k) represent the unit vectors in the x, y, and z directions respectively.

There are also other ways but hopefully that clears it up.

edit: It might help to write things out explicitly:

\hat{i} = &lt;1, 0, 0&gt;
\hat{j} = &lt;0, 1, 0&gt;
\hat{k} = &lt;0, 0, 1&gt;

Thus x\hat{i} + y\hat{j}
is the same as:
x&lt;1, 0, 0&gt; + y&lt;0, 1, 0&gt;
or
&lt;x, 0, 0&gt; + &lt;0, y, 0&gt;
or
&lt;x, y, 0&gt;

I chose to write it out in 3D coordinates (x,y,z) because usually you deal with all 3 unit vectors i, j and kI mentioned before that usually the vectors are written as though they are starting at the origin. In this case you are explicitly told to find the r vector FROM q1. Thus you can treat q1 as your (origin) when writing out your vector.
 
Last edited:
Any point in 2D (x,y) or 3D (x,y,z) has a vector notation called position vector.

this vector has its head at the point (x,y,z) and tail at (0,0,0)

the other vectors are which are called (not sure) displacement vectors.

they are like ... formed out of 2 position vectors

attachment.php?attachmentid=37391&stc=1&d=1311246081.png


for points (1,2) and (3,1) position vectors are \vec{OA}, \ \vec{OB}

and vector \vec{AB} \ = \ \vec{OA} \ - \ \vec{OB}

here you have to find a vector something like AB
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    736 bytes · Views: 1,115
Thanks heaps, I did learn this at uni (in the 90's) so all has been forgotten! All coming back to me slowly! thanks heaps
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top