How Do You Find Frequency in an RC Circuit?

AI Thread Summary
To find the frequency in an RC circuit, the impedance (Z) is calculated using the formula Z = [R^2 + (1/wC)^2]^(1/2), where w is the angular frequency. The confusion arose from differing resistance values provided in the problem, leading to uncertainty about the setup. Initially, there was an assumption that Z equals R, which resulted in an incorrect equation. Ultimately, the correct frequency equation f = 1/(2πRC) was confirmed by using the appropriate values from the problem. The user resolved their confusion and sought assistance on deleting the thread after finding the solution.
argent
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
RC Circuit, Finding Frequency? [Solved]

Solved =]

Homework Statement



question.jpg


Homework Equations



Z = [ R2 + (1/wC)2 ]1/2
where Z is impedance, w = (omega) = angular frequency

Xc = 1/(wC)

w = 2(pi)f

(tau) = RC
where (tau) is the time constant

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm more confused than anything. Like I'm not sure what the set up is.
setup.jpg


Just looking at the problem itself, the first part seems to give different numbers. When in the first part R = 4857.1 Ohms, and then in the second part R = 3629.6 Ohms?

At first I was working under the assumption that Z = R, but that would result in 0=1/(wC)
Then I googled impedance of the capacitor and some sources say that that is Xc, the capacitive reactance. So I solved R = Xc = 1/(wC) got that f = 1/ [ RC2(pi) ] , but when I tried plugging it in, I still couldn't get the answer that they have.EDIT:
Nevermind. I just figured it out. Turns out I was right for the frequency equation. I just used the numbers given instead in the second part and completely ignored the first part, and got the answer.

Um, how do I delete a thread?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Glad you got it figured out
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top