How Do You Find the Electric Potential of a Uniformly Charged Rod?

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric potential of a uniformly charged rod, the charge density λ is calculated as Q/L. The integral for electric potential V involves evaluating the definite integral of λ/(d+L) over the correct limits. The user initially computed the indefinite integral but failed to apply the proper limits, leading to an incorrect potential value. It is emphasized that the lower limit of the integral does not equal zero and must be carefully chosen. Correct evaluation of the definite integral will yield the accurate electric potential at point P1.
seraphimhouse
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The figure shows a thin plastic rod of length L = 11.8 cm and uniform positive charge Q = 58.9 fC lying on an x axis. With V = 0 at infinity, find the electric potential at point P1 on the axis, at distance d = 3.45 cm from one end of the rod.

http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1650/art/qb/qu/c24/qu_24_30.gif

Homework Equations



dq = \lambdadx

\lambda = Q/L

\intdV = dq/r

The Attempt at a Solution



so after doing some substitutions i get

\intdV = k \int \lambda/ (d+L) dL

Simplifying it I get:

\intdV = k\lambda\int1/(d+L) dL

After U-Sub I get:

k\lambdaln(d+L)

Plugging all the values in I would get -0.008439 V. But it seems to be wrong. I'm sure it's somewhere around my integration that I messed up on. Any help would be great.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello seraphimhouse,

The limits of integration are important on this one. It seems you've evaluated the indefinite integral, but you need to evaluate the definite integral over the correct limits.

I'm guessing you are new to \LaTeX, so you can use my equation below as a template if you're unfamiliar on how to write the limits on the integral sign (if you'd like).

V = \int _{l=a} ^b \frac{k \lambda}{(d+l)}dl

Of course, you need to choose appropriate values for a and b. And then evaluate the expression, once you have solved the indefinite integral (through substitution, like you've already done).

(Hint: the resulting expression, when evaluated with the bottom limit, is not zero! :wink:)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top