How Do You Find the Ratio of Centripetal Acceleration for Different Radii?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bakeit1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
To find the ratio of centripetal acceleration for different radii, the formula Ac = v^2/r is essential. The problem involves a helicopter blade with a length of 6.40 m and requires calculating the ratio of centripetal acceleration at the blade's tip compared to a point 2.86 m from the center. The discussion highlights frustration over the lack of direct guidance, with one participant expressing annoyance at being asked for basic formulas despite already knowing them. Clarifications indicate that understanding the problem's conceptual nature is crucial, as there isn't much work to show without additional context. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of clear communication in educational settings.
bakeit1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am having some trouble with this problem, an explanation on how to do this would be awesome, thanks:

The large blade of a helicopter is rotating in a horizontal circle. The length of the blade is 6.40 m, measured from its tip to the center of the circle. Find the ratio of the centripetal acceleration at the end of the blade to that which exists at a point located 2.86 m from the center of the circle.

I just don't see how there's enough info. to solve this. Please explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the formula for centripetal acceleration?
 
reply

Ac=v^2/r

But the problem only gives you two radius', so I'm not sure what to do next.
 
nvm, I got the answer. Why couldn't you just explain that I had to divide the two numbers instead of asking me for the Ac formula, which I already knew? I hate teachers that make me in circles trying to find an answer.
 
bakeit1 said:
nvm, I got the answer. Why couldn't you just explain that I had to divide the two numbers instead of asking me for the Ac formula, which I already knew? I hate teachers that make me in circles trying to find an answer.

In your first post you didn't say you knew the formula, so how are we to know? You didn't show any work. When we get a post like that we will start off by asking basic questions, to see what your understanding is.
 
bakeit1 said:
I hate teachers that make me in circles trying to find an answer.

Sorry, to interfere, but I feel very sorry for you "bakeit1". I feel, best way to let students learn, is by letting them rack their mind before providing with a solution. And, if you have some time to notice, this is also the motto of this forum. If you are looking for direct answers, I guess you are at wrong place.
 
ok

saket said:
Sorry, to interfere, but I feel very sorry for you "bakeit1". I feel, best way to let students learn, is by letting them rack their mind before providing with a solution. And, if you have some time to notice, this is also the motto of this forum. If you are looking for direct answers, I guess you are at wrong place.

Had I been looking for a direct answer I would have stated so in my first post. I agree, giving someone an answer is meaningless, but i'd rather have you explain the answer, or atleast how to go about doing it.
 
well

hage567 said:
In your first post you didn't say you knew the formula, so how are we to know? You didn't show any work. When we get a post like that we will start off by asking basic questions, to see what your understanding is.

Well there really isn't any work to be shown to this problem; it's more conceptual. Albeit you either know how to do it or you don't. It's not like I could have attempted anything, as I didn't even know where to begin with JUST the two radius'.
 
Back
Top