How do you find the time-dependent wavefunction for a particle on a ring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physgirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunction
physgirl
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If given, for instance, psi(phi, 0)=[1/sqrt(2pi)](cos^2(phi/2) + isin(phi)), which is the wavefunction at t=0, how do you go about finding the wavefunction at time t, psi(phi,t)??

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Would it simply be psi(phi, t)=psi(phi,0)e^(-iEt/hbar)??

The given wavefunction is for a particle on a ring... and for that, E_n=(hbar^2)(m^2)/(2I) where I=mr^2. Is that the value of "E" I plug into the above equation??

Is there any other constant that I have to multiply the psi(phi,t) equation by as a result of adding on the e^(-iEt/hbar) term??

Any help would be great, I'm not entirely sure if I get this :-/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, you have to write the initial wave function as a sum of energy eigenfunctions with suitable coefficients. Then, as time evolves, each term gets multiplied by e^(-iE_n t/hbar), where E_n is the eigenenergy of that eigenfunction.
 
I'm not sure how to express psi (phi, 0) as a sum of energy eigenfunctions in this case...
 
What are the energy eigenfunctions?

If it's a free particle on a ring, they should be e^(i n phi), n=...,-1,0,+1,..., up to normalization. (The m^2 in your E_n should be n^2, no?)

Your psi(phi,0) is some trig functions; can you express these in terms of complex exponentials?
 
yes and yes. (1/sqrt(2pi))e^(i n phi) is the eigenfunction. and I really meant n^2 when I said m^2 previously...

I just expressed my psi(phi, 0) in exponential terms. The psi I gave in the original post left out some constants, but when I do take into account those:

psi(phi,0)=sqrt(1/4pi) (e^(i phi) + 1)

but how does this get into a summation form..? :-/
 
It already is in a summation form. You have

psi(phi,0) = (1/sqrt(2))( psi_1(phi) + psi_0(phi) ),

where psi_n(phi) is the eigenfunction.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top