How do you know if you should use 3 variables for 4 variables in IC design?

AI Thread Summary
In IC design, the number of variables needed depends on the range of values being represented. For numbers greater than 9, four variables are necessary to accurately represent values in binary, as each variable doubles the range of representable numbers. Using only three variables would limit the output range and lead to incorrect representations, as demonstrated by the confusion between binary values. The original implementation of the Boolean expression requires four variables to ensure correct outputs for all values above 9. Simplifying the expression with fewer variables is not feasible without losing accuracy in representation.
mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone, I just noticed, my IC for numbers greater then 9 to output 1, has 4 variables, why does it have to have 4 variables? couldn't I just use ABC?, because isn't 0000 == 000 and 1001 == 101, isn't 1001 9 and 101 9 also? what's the difference? I think if i just used 3 variables instead of 4 it will make the boolean expression must easier to simplfy! because then i could probably use a k-map to help me out. Here is my orginal implementation of a Boolean expression to output 1 if the number is > 9. http://img282.imageshack.us/img282/482/lastscan45vd.jpg Could this be implemented with 3 variables?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
000---0
001---1
010---2
011---3
100---4
101---5
110---6
111---7
1000--8
1001--9

Counting in binary.
 
You seem to be having trouble with number system representation. If a system has a base of 'nine' through 'sixteen' (Base 9 => 0 through 8) it needs four variables for representation. 101 = 5!

KM
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top